Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;34(7):641-650.
doi: 10.1002/da.22594. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Altered resting state functional connectivity of fear and reward circuitry in comorbid PTSD and major depression

Affiliations

Altered resting state functional connectivity of fear and reward circuitry in comorbid PTSD and major depression

Xi Zhu et al. Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder (PTSD-MDD) often exhibit greater functional impairment and poorer treatment response than individuals with PTSD alone. Research has not determined whether PTSD-MDD is associated with different network connectivity abnormalities than PTSD alone.

Methods: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure resting state functional connectivity (rs-FC) patterns of brain regions involved in fear and reward processing in three groups: patients with PTSD-alone (n = 27), PTSD-MDD (n = 21), and trauma-exposed healthy controls (TEHCs, n = 34). Based on previous research, seeds included basolateral amygdala (BLA), centromedial amygdala (CMA), and nucleus accumbens (NAcc).

Results: Regardless of MDD comorbidity, PTSD was associated with decreased connectivity of BLA-orbitalfrontal cortex (OFC) and CMA-thalamus pathways, key to fear processing, and fear expression, respectively. PTSD-MDD, compared to PTSD-alone and TEHC, was associated with decreased connectivity across multiple amygdala and striatal-subcortical pathways: BLA-OFC, NAcc-thalamus, and NAcc-hippocampus. Further, while both the BLA-OFC and the NAcc-thalamus pathways were correlated with MDD symptoms, PTSD symptoms correlated with the amygdala pathways (BLA-OFC; CMA-thalamus) only.

Conclusions: Comorbid PTSD-MDD may be associated with multifaceted functional connectivity alterations in both fear and reward systems. Clinical implications are discussed.

Keywords: MDD; PTSD; amygdala; depression; fear processing; nucleus accumbens; resting state functional connectivity; reward processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Drs. Zhu, Helpman, Van Meter, Lindquist, Wager, and Mr. Papini, report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Centromedial amygdala (CMA) (right and left, Red) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) (right and left, blue) seed ROIs. The underlying brain template is from FSL MNI152 standard-space T1-weighted average structural template image
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Decreased BLA-OFC, CMA-THA connectivity were found in PTSD, when compared with TEHC (p < .05, FDR-corrected)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Rs-FC of BLA-OFC, CMA-THA, NAcc-THA, and NAcc-HIP for PTSD-MDD, PTSD-alone, and TEHC groups. ANCOVA revealed significant differences among the three groups in NAcc-THA (F(2,81) = 5.5, pFDR < .05), and NAcc-HIP (F(2,81) = 3.9, pFDR < .05) connections. Significant connectivity revealed by post hoc ANCOVA tests were marked as asterisk (*)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Correlations between CAPS scores and rs-FC of BLA-OFC (r=−0.288, p ≤ .006) (left) and CMA-THA (r=−0.234, p ≤ .006) (right) in all PTSD participants (PTSD-alone and PTSD-MDD combined). NAcc-THA (r=−0.12) and NAcc-HIP (r=−0.078) were not correlated with CAPS total score in all PTSD participants. Blue dot: PTSD-alone, green dot: PTSD-MDD
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Correlations between HAMD total and FC of BLA-OFC (r=−0.324, p ≤ .006) (left) and NAcc-THA (r=−0.342, p ≤ .006) (right) in all PTSD participants (PTSD-alone and PTSD-MDD combined). NAcc-HIP (r = −0.213, p = .056) and CMA-THA (r = −0.061, p = .589) did not reach significant. Blue dot: PTSD-alone, Green dot: PTSD-MDD

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acierno R, Gros DF, Ruggiero KJ, Hernandez-Tejada BM, Knapp RG, Lejuez CW, … Tuerk PW. Behavioral activation and therapeutic exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder: A noninferiority trial of treatment delivered in person versus home-based telehealth. Depression and Anxiety. 2016;33(5):415–423. - PubMed
    1. Admon R, Holsen LM, Aizley H, Remington A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Goldstein JM, Pizzagalli DA. Striatal hypersensitivity during stress in remitted individuals with recurrent depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2015;78:67–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aghajani M, Veer IM, van Hoof MJ, Rombouts SA, van der Wee NJ, Vermeiren RR. Abnormal functional architecture of amygdala centered networks in adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder. Human Brain Mapping. 2016;37:1120–1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-4 TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Baxter MG, Parker A, Lindner CC, Izquierdo AD, Murray EA. Control of response selection by reinforcer value requires interaction of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2000;20:4311–4319. - PMC - PubMed