Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 15:54:143-151.
doi: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0043. eCollection 2016 Dec 1.

Performance Assessment in Water Polo Using Compositional Data Analysis

Affiliations

Performance Assessment in Water Polo Using Compositional Data Analysis

Enrique García Ordóñez et al. J Hum Kinet. .

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify groups of offensive performance indicators which best discriminated between a match score (favourable, balanced or unfavourable) in water polo. The sample comprised 88 regular season games (2011-2014) from the Spanish Professional Water Polo League. The offensive performance indicators were clustered in five groups: Attacks in relation to the different playing situations; Shots in relation to the different playing situations; Attacks outcome; Origin of shots; Technical execution of shots. The variables of each group had a constant sum which equalled 100%. The data were compositional data, therefore the variables were changed by means of the additive log-ratio (alr) transformation. Multivariate discriminant analyses to compare the match scores were calculated using the transformed variables. With regard to the percentage of right classification, the results showed the group that discriminated the most between the match scores was "Attacks outcome" (60.4% for the original sample and 52.2% for cross-validation). The performance indicators that discriminated the most between the match scores in games with penalties were goals (structure coefficient (SC) = .761), counterattack shots (SC = .541) and counterattacks (SC = .481). In matches without penalties, goals were the primary discriminating factor (SC = .576). This approach provides a new tool to compare the importance of the offensive performance groups and their effect on the match score discrimination.

Keywords: observational analysis; performance profile; statistical data analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of the division of the court according to 6 zones (Lupo et al., 2012)

References

    1. Aitchison J. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.;; 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data.
    1. Bilge M. Game Analysis of Olympic, World and European Championships in Men´s Handball. J Hum Kinet. 2012;35:109–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carling C, Reilly T, Williams AM. Performance assessment for field sports. London: New York Routledge;; 2009.
    1. Carling C, Williams AM, Reilly T. Handbook of soccer match analysis: A systematic approach to improving performance. London: New York Routledge;; 2005.
    1. Escalante Y, Saavedra JM, Mansilla M, Tella V. Discriminatory power of water polo game-related statistics at the 2008 Olympic Games. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(3):291–298. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources