Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 1;1(4):FSO58.
doi: 10.4155/fso.15.58. eCollection 2015 Nov.

A first approach to evaluate the cell dose in highly porous scaffolds by using a nondestructive metabolic method

Affiliations

A first approach to evaluate the cell dose in highly porous scaffolds by using a nondestructive metabolic method

Carla Divieto et al. Future Sci OA. .

Abstract

Background: In cell-based therapies, in vitro studies on biomimetic cell-scaffold constructs can facilitate the determination of the cell dose, a key factor in guaranteeing the effectiveness of the treatment. However, highly porous scaffolds do not allow a nondestructive evaluation of the cell number. Our objective was to develop a nondestructive method for human mesenchymal stem cells dose evaluation in a highly porous scaffold for bone regeneration.

Materials & measurement method: Proliferation trend of human mesenchymal stem cells on Biocoral® scaffolds was measured by a resazurin-based assay here optimized for 3D cultures. The method allows to noninvasively follow the cell proliferation on biocorals over 3 weeks with very high reproducibility.

Conclusion: This reliable method could be a powerful tool in cell-based therapies for cell dose determination.

Keywords: Biocoral®; cell dose; cell number; cell proliferation; hMSCs; nondestructive methods; porous scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure The research leading to these results was partially founded by the Regione Piemonte under CIPE 2007 “bando converging technologies” – Grant Agreement No. 0126000010 – METREGEN. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.. Biocoral scaffolds images.
(A) Biocorals have been acquired with digital camera, and (B–E) scanning electron microscopy. (B & C) show a scaffold before seeding: in (B) the scaffold surface where cells are usually seeded (scale bar = 4 mm) and in (C) the scaffold internal pores, after scaffold mechanical fragmentation(scale bar = 1 mm). (D & E) show a scaffold after cell seeding andcell fixation: in (D) fixed cells (arrows) occupied some pores (bar =500 μm) and in (E) at higher magnification two cells in two different pores (arrows; scale bar = 300 μm).
<b>Figure 2.</b>
Figure 2.. Calibration curve for 3D cell culture on Biocoral®.
Fluorescence intensity of resazurin metabolized by cells on biocorals after 2 h incubation. The correlation between the fluorescence intensity and the nominal cell number, was found linear in the range between 5 × 103 and 3.0 × 105 cells. The correlation coefficient was 0.967. Error bars: horizontal bars are the uncertainty if the manual counting estimated as 5%; vertical bars are the uncertainty of the fluorescence measurements estimated as 5.9%.
<b>Figure 3.</b>
Figure 3.. Calibration curve for 2D cell culture.
Cells were seeded in six-well plate in the range of 1.0 × 103 and 2.5 × 105 per well. Resazurin was incubated with cells for 2 h. The correlation coefficient was 0.995. Error bars: horizontal bars are the uncertainty if the manual counting estimated as 5%; vertical bars are the uncertainty of the fluorescence measurements (estimated as 5%), n = 3.
<b>Figure 4.</b>
Figure 4.. Experimental reproducibility: fluorescence intensity on biocorals seeded with 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 × 105 cells.
Mean fluorescence intensity from human mesenchymal stem cells at P7 seeded at three nominal cell number (0.5 and 1.0 and 3.0 × 105 cells) on biocorals (n = 3 for 0.5 and 1.0 × 105 cells; n = 6 for 3.0 × 105 cells) and measured over time at days 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21. Error bars represent the uncertainty of the measurement calculated quadratically composing the experimental repeatability and the experimental reproducibility.
<b>Figure 5.</b>
Figure 5.. Pore distribution of a representative portion of Biocoral® scaffolds.
The pore size distribution ranges from 100 to 700 μm.
<b>Figure 6.</b>
Figure 6.. Resazurin and resorufin emission spectra.
A low number and a high number of cells after 2 h incubation metabolize differently a resazurin 44 μl solution. The excitation was at 540 nm and the maximum emission (peaks) was found around 635 nm for resazurin metabolized by low number of cells (i.e., low concentrated resorufin) and 600 nm for resazurin metabolized by high number of cells (i.e., high concentrated resorufin).
<b>Figure 7.</b>
Figure 7.. Incubation time is cell number dependent.
Cells seeded at higher density need a shorter incubation time to avoid off-scales. Points on curves at 4 and 6 h were off-scale after 5.0 × 104 and 1.0 × 105, respectively (missing points on curves). The optimal incubation time was found to be 2 h allowing to measure intensity on the entire range of cell number with no need for dilution.
<b>Figure 8.</b>
Figure 8.. Effect of dilution.
Dilution 1:9 of the same metabolized resazurin analyzed and shown in Figure 4 are represented here.
<b>Figure 9.</b>
Figure 9.. Incubation time and temperature effect.
The fluorescence measurement should be done as soon as the cells, or the metabolized resazurin, are taken from the incubator. The temperature decrease modifies the fluorescence intensity presumably due to the temperature-dependent pH decrease in absence of CO2 or other pH buffers. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three samples (n = 3).
<b>Figure 10.</b>
Figure 10.. Sensitivity of the method: fluorescence intensity on biocorals seeded with 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 × 103 cells.
Error bars (n = 3) represent the uncertainty of the measurement, calculated quadratically composing the fluorescence intensity measurement uncertainty and the experimental repeatability.
<b>Figure 11.</b>
Figure 11.. Cell proliferation on Biocoral®.
Proliferation curves on Biocorals expressed as number of cells (n) versus time (days in culture). Scaffolds seeded with 1.0 × 104 nominal human mesenchymal stem cells and scaffolds seeded with 5.0 × 104 nominal human mesenchymal stem cells. Error bars are the standard deviation among three scaffolds (n = 3).
<b>Figure 12.</b>
Figure 12.. 2D and 3D cell cultures proliferation trend.
Fluorescence intensity emitted by cells as function of the days in culture. In 2D cell cultures at high density the proliferation trend showed the typical lag and log phases and a final plateau, the medium and low densities showed a lag and log phases both supposed being close to reach the plateau. In 3D cell cultures the trend is very similar in all three initial densities, however the lag phase is much longer and the log phase just starts at day 6. Error bars represent the uncertainty of the measurement as described in the Materials & measurement method section ‘Experimental repeatability and reproducibility on 3D cell cultures’.
<b>Figure 13.</b>
Figure 13.. Cell viability assay: cell colonization of external and internal surfaces.
Fluorescence microscopy and confocal microscopy images of human mesenchymal stem cells on Biocorals®. In green are shown human mesenchymal stem cells after 7 and 21 days of 3D cell culture at 5×, 10×, 20× and 40× magnification. In (A–E) cells were imaged after 7 days in 3D culture by fluorescence microscopy: in (A) and (B) cells within the Biocoral® pores appear black with rounded shape in (A), bar = 150 μm; in (C) and (D) details of two single cells adherent to the scaffold structure, bar = 50 μm; in (E) a cell adherent to the wall of a single pore bar = 100 μm. In (F–J) cells were imaged after 21 days in 3D culture by confocal microscopy: in (F) cells on the external surface delineating the scaffold boundaries, bar = 150 μm; in (G) cells within the scaffold, bar = 50 μm; in (H) and (I) cells on the surface, bar = 100 μm; in (J) it is visible one pore containing three cells bar = 50 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yang J, Yamato M, Nishida K, et al. Cell delivery in regenerative medicine: the cell sheet engineering approach. J. Control. Release. 2006;116:193–203. - PubMed
    2. • Importance of 3D models.

    1. Watson L, Elliman SJ, Coleman CM. From isolation to implantation: a concise review of mesenchymal stem cell therapies in fracture repair. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014;5:51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyer U, Wiesmann HP. Bone and Cartilage Engineering. Springer Publishing; Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: 2006. pp. 121–130.
    1. Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(4):313–319. - PMC - PubMed
    2. • Highlight important concepts addressed in the manuscript about human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) potenciality for regenerative medicine (RM).

    1. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007;213:341–347. - PubMed
    2. • Highlight important concepts addressed in the manuscript about hMSCs potentiality for RM.

LinkOut - more resources