Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Nov;8(4):447-453.
doi: 10.1111/os.12280.

Correlations of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring Systems with Gait Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Diseases

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Correlations of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring Systems with Gait Parameters in Patients with Degenerative Spinal Diseases

Chen-Fan Zheng et al. Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were developed to evaluate the neurological function of patients with cervical or lumbar degeneration. As patient-based and multi-dimensional clinical evaluation tools, these systems should be capable of reflecting the walking disability of patients. The association between JOA scores and gait parameters, however, are not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlations between JOA scores and gait parameters of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LDH).

Methods: A total of 32 CSM and 30 LDH patients with gait dysfunction were recruited for the present study. All patients were diagnosed by two senior orthopaedic doctors and evaluated with JOA scoring systems. A body-mounted motion analyzer, the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEEA), was applied to measure gait parameters of patients across 30 m of flat floor in an orthopaedic ward. A linear regression model was used to determine the correlations between JOA scores and gait parameters. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify the relationships between subsections of the JOA systems and gait parameters.

Results: Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores of LDH patients from the JOA lumbar scoring system are significantly correlated with gait speed (R 2 = 0.557, P < 0.001) and stride length (R 2 = 0.544, P < 0.001). JOA scores are also correlated with double support duration, step duration, cycle duration and cadence, and weakly correlated with single support duration. For the four subsections of the JOA lumbar scoring system, "restriction of activities of daily living" is the significant predictor of all gait parameters, especially gait speed (R 2 = 0.573, P < 0.001) and stride length (R 2 = 0.553, P < 0.001). However, JOA scores of CSM patients from the JOA cervical scoring system are only weakly correlated with these measures (all R 2 < 0.3). For the four subsections of the JOA cervical scoring system, "motor function of the lower extremity" is a weak predictor of gait parameters (all R 2 < 0.3).

Conclusions: There is a significant correlation between gait parameters and functional disability as measured by the JOA lumbar scoring system, which indicates that the JOA lumbar scoring system can reflect gait impairment. The JOA cervical scoring system, however, may need to be improved for efficiently evaluating the walking ability of CSM patients in the assessment of motor function of the lower extremity.

Keywords: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Gait; JOA scores; Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEEA) system: (A) composition of IDEEA; (B) the sensor on chest; (C) the sensors on thighs; (D) the sensors on ankles; and (E) the sensors on the bottom of feet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar score and gait speed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar score and stride length.

References

    1. Garza‐Ramos R, Nicholas B, Kerezoudis P, et al. Deep‐wound and organ‐space infection after surgery for degenerative spine disease: an analysis from 2006 to 2012. Neurol Res, 2016: 117–123. - PubMed
    1. Sasiadek MJ, Bladowska J. Imaging of degenerative spine disease‐‐the state of the art. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2012, 21: 133–142. - PubMed
    1. Montgomery DM, Brower RS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am, 1992, 23: 487–493. - PubMed
    1. Liu B, Ma W, Zhu F, Guo CH, Yang WL. Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: subjective evaluation and cost analysis. Orthop Surg, 2012, 4: 47–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26: E93–E113. - PubMed

Publication types