Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0168769.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168769. eCollection 2016.

Improving the Preoperative Diagnostic Accuracy of Acute Appendicitis. Can Fecal Calprotectin Be Helpful?

Affiliations

Improving the Preoperative Diagnostic Accuracy of Acute Appendicitis. Can Fecal Calprotectin Be Helpful?

Peter C Ambe et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Is the patient really suffering from acute appendicitis? Right lower quadrant pain is the most common sign of acute appendicitis. However, many other bowels pathologies might mimic acute appendicitis. Due to fear of the consequences of delayed or missed diagnosis, the indication for emergency appendectomy is liberally made. This has been shown to be associated with high rates of negative appendectomy with risk of potentially serious or lethal complications. Thus there is need for a better preoperative screening of patients with suspected appendicitis.

Methods: This prospective single center single-blinded pilot study was conducted in the Department of surgery at the HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Germany. Calprotectin was measured in pre-therapeutic stool samples of patients presenting in the emergency department with pain to the right lower quadrant. Fecal calprotectin (FC) values were analyzed using commercially available ELISA kits. Cut-off values for FC were studied using the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The Area under the curve (AUC) was reported for each ROC curve.

Results: The mean FC value was 51.4 ± 118.8 μg/g in patients with AA, 320.9 ± 416.6 μg/g in patients with infectious enteritis and 24.8 ± 27.4 μg/g in the control group. ROC curve showed a close to 80% specificity and sensitivity of FC for AA at a cut-off value of 51 μg/g, AUC = 0.7. The sensitivity of FC at this cut-off value is zero for enteritis with a specificity of 35%.

Conclusion: Fecal calprotectin could be helpful in screening patients with pain to the right lower quadrant for the presence of acute appendicitis or infectious enteritis with the aim of facilitating clinical decision-making and reducing the rate of negative appendectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Positive histochemistry with specific anti calprotectin antibody.
Positive (gold) immunohistochemical staining (red arrows) with specific anti-calprotectin antibody.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Negative control with specific anti calprotectin antibody.
Negative reaction (no gold stain) following immunochemical staining.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distribution of the study population.
Distribution of the study population according to the STARD Guidelines
Fig 4
Fig 4. Mean fecal calprotectin values.
Mean fecal calprotectin values in the groups with appendicitis, infectious enteritis and healthy controls.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for fecal calprotectin.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for fecal calprotectin in prediction the presence of acute appendicitis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.869 (95% confidence interval (CI) CI 0.715–1.0), p = 0.009.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for WBC and CRP.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for WBC (AUC: 0.728, 95% CI: 0.473–0.983, p = 0.098) and CRP in prediction the presence of acute appendicitis (AUC: 0.316, 95% CI: 0.033–0.593, p = 0.181).

References

    1. Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT: Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015, 386(10000):1278–1287. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson M, Ruber M, Ekerfelt C, Hallgren HB, Olaison G, Andersson RE: Can new inflammatory markers improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis? World J Surg 2014, 38(11):2777–2783. 10.1007/s00268-014-2708-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2013, 100(3):322–329. 10.1002/bjs.9008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL: Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA 1996, 276(19):1589–1594. - PubMed
    1. Yu JS, Lee WS, Kim YH: Primary Torsion of Lesser Omentum Presented with Acute Abdomen and Successfully Managed with Laparoscopic Surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016, 129(13):1625–1626. - PMC - PubMed

Substances