Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval
- PMID: 2803609
- DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.3
Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval
Abstract
An experiment is reported that examines age-related differences in the lag effect and its relation to retention interval. A total of 30 young and 30 older adults received both once-presented pairs and twice-presented pairs that were tested in a continuous cued-recall paradigm either after a short retention interval (2 pairs intervening between the last presentation of a pair and its test) or a long retention interval (20 pairs intervening between the last presentation of a pair and its test). In addition, the twice-presented pairs were separated by either 0, 1, 4, 8, or 20 intervening pairs. The results replicated the interaction between retention interval and lag that has been reported by Glenberg (1976, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1-16). Furthermore, although the older adults performed considerably lower than the younger adults in overall recall performance, their data were remarkably similar to the younger adults in the patterning of means. A mathematical modeling procedure was used to fit the data to Estes' stimulus fluctuation model. The results of this modeling procedure suggest that, compared with younger adults, older adults (a) encode less contextual information at a given point in time and (b) have a slower rate of contextual fluctuation across time.
Similar articles
-
[Recall and reproduction of words: age-dependent activation of context information in recalling episodic memory contents].Z Gerontol. 1989 Nov-Dec;22(6):298-307. Z Gerontol. 1989. PMID: 2623931 German.
-
Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Sep;68(5):674-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs096. Epub 2012 Oct 25. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013. PMID: 23103383
-
Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.Psychol Aging. 1989 Jun;4(2):131-5. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.131. Psychol Aging. 1989. PMID: 2789740
-
Are There Age Differences in Consolidated Episodic Memory?Exp Aging Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):97-119. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586104. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Exp Aging Res. 2019. PMID: 30849026
-
Does job-related training performance decline with age?Psychol Aging. 1996 Mar;11(1):92-107. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.11.1.92. Psychol Aging. 1996. PMID: 8726375 Review.
Cited by
-
Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):768-80. doi: 10.1037/pag0000049. Epub 2015 Aug 31. Psychol Aging. 2015. PMID: 26322551 Free PMC article.
-
Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):159-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03196362. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 15948289
-
Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval.Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):965-77. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0406-1. Mem Cognit. 2014. PMID: 24643791
-
The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):316-25. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.316. Mem Cognit. 2009. PMID: 19246346
-
Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response.Brain Behav. 2021 Jan;11(1):e01944. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1944. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Brain Behav. 2021. PMID: 33185985 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical