Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Feb;49(2):212-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

Confirming model-predicted pharmacokinetic interactions between bedaquiline and lopinavir/ritonavir or nevirapine in patients with HIV and drug-resistant tuberculosis

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Confirming model-predicted pharmacokinetic interactions between bedaquiline and lopinavir/ritonavir or nevirapine in patients with HIV and drug-resistant tuberculosis

Margreke J E Brill et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Bedaquiline and its metabolite M2 are metabolised by CYP3A4. The antiretrovirals ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) and nevirapine inhibit and induce CYP3A4, respectively. Here we aimed to quantify nevirapine and LPV/r drug-drug interaction effects on bedaquiline and M2 in patients co-infected with HIV and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) using population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and compare these with model-based predictions from single-dose studies in subjects without TB. An observational PK study was performed in three groups of MDR-TB patients during bedaquiline maintenance dosing: HIV-seronegative patients (n = 17); and HIV-infected patients using antiretroviral therapy including nevirapine (n = 17) or LPV/r (n = 14). Bedaquiline and M2 samples were collected over 48 h post-dose. A previously developed PK model of MDR-TB patients was used as prior information to inform parameter estimation using NONMEM. The model was able to describe bedaquiline and M2 concentrations well, with estimates close to their priors and earlier model-based interaction effects from single-dose studies. Nevirapine changed bedaquiline clearance to 82% (95% CI 67-99%) and M2 clearance to 119% (92-156%) of their original values, indicating no clinically significant interaction. LPV/r substantially reduced bedaquiline clearance to 25% (17-35%) and M2 clearance to 59% (44-69%) of original values. This work confirms earlier model-based predictions of nevirapine and LPV/r interaction effects on bedaquiline and M2 clearance from subjects without TB in single-dose studies, in MDR-TB/HIV co-infected patients studied here. To normalise bedaquiline exposure in patients with concomitant LPV/r therapy, an adjusted bedaquiline dosing regimen is proposed for further study.

Keywords: Bedaquiline; Drug–drug interactions; Nevirapine; Population pharmacokinetic modelling; Prior information; Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources