The ReACT Trial: Randomized Evaluation of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial
- PMID: 28040445
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.018
The ReACT Trial: Randomized Evaluation of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography (FUCAG) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in daily clinical practice in Japan.
Background: The long-term clinical impact of routine FUCAG after PCI in real-world clinical practice has not been evaluated adequately.
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, patients who underwent successful PCI were randomly assigned to routine angiographic follow-up (AF) group, in which patients were to receive FUCAG at 8 to 12 months after PCI, or clinical follow-up alone (CF) group. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum of 1.5 years follow-up.
Results: Between May 2010 and July 2014, 700 patients were enrolled in the trial among 22 participating centers and were randomly assigned to the AF group (n = 349) or the CF group (n = 351). During a median of 4.6 years of follow-up (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.1 to 5.2 years), the cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary endpoint was 22.4% in the AF group and 24.7% in the CF group (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 1.31; p = 0.70). Any coronary revascularization within the first year was more frequently performed in AF group than in CF group (12.8% vs. 3.8%; log-rank p < 0.001), although the difference between the 2 groups attenuated over time with a similar cumulative 5-year incidence (19.6% vs. 18.1%; log-rank p = 0.92).
Conclusions: No clinical benefits were observed for routine FUCAG after PCI and early coronary revascularization rates were increased within routine FUCAG strategy in the current trial. (Randomized Evaluation of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial [ReACT]; NCT01123291).
Keywords: angiographic follow-up; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis; stent(s).
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Routine Surveillance Coronary Angiography Post-PCI: Should We ReACT and Change Our Routine?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 23;10(2):118-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 28. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28040444 No abstract available.
-
Angiographic Follow-Up in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Is There a Window to Be Definitively Closed?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):843-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.042. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28427606 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Angiographic Follow-Up in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Is There a Window to Be Definitively Closed?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):844-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.025. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28427607 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
