Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 31;109(1):djw263.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw263. Print 2017 Jan.

Recommendations for Clinical Trial Development in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Affiliations
Review

Recommendations for Clinical Trial Development in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Stephen E Spurgeon et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comprises around 6% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses. In younger patients, age less than 60 to 65 years, aggressive induction often followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant has suggested improved outcomes in this population. Less intensive therapies in older patients often followed by maintenance have been studied or are under active investigation. However, despite recent advances, MCL remains incurable, with a median overall survival of around five years. Patients with high-risk disease have particularly poor outcomes. Treatment varies widely across institutions, and to date no randomized trials comparing intensive vs less intensive approaches have been reported. Although recent data have highlighted the heterogeneity of MCL outcomes, patient assessment for treatment selection has largely been driven by patient age with little regard to fitness, disease biology, or disease risk. One critical advance is the finding that minimal residual disease status (MRD) after induction correlates with long-term outcomes. As such, its use as a potential end point could inform clinical trial design. In order to more rapidly improve the outcomes of MCL patients, clinical trials are needed that prospectively stratify patients on the basis of MCL biology and disease risk, incorporate novel agents, and use MRD to guide the need for additional therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overall survival by risk group in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma by risk group. Reprinted from (88) with permission from the copyright holder. HR = high risk; IR = intermediate risk; LR = low risk.

References

    1. Zhou Y, Wang H, Fang W, et al. Incidence trends of mantle cell lymphoma in the United States between 1992 and 2004. Cancer. 2008;113(4):791–798. - PubMed
    1. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, et al. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: A proposal from the international lymphoma study group. Blood. 1994;84(5):1361–1392. - PubMed
    1. Chandran R, Gardiner S, Simon M, Spurgeon SE. Survival trends in mantle cell lymphoma in the United States over 16 years 1992-2007. Leuk Lymph. 2012;53(8):1488–1493. - PubMed
    1. Herrmann A, Hoster E, Zwingers T, et al. Improvement of overall survival in advanced stage mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(4):511–518. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt C, Dreyling M. Therapy of mantle cell lymphoma: Current standards and future strategies. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2008;22(5):953–963. - PubMed

MeSH terms