Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168011.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168011. eCollection 2017.

Early Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Null Longitudinal Model-Based Classifiers

Affiliations

Early Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Null Longitudinal Model-Based Classifiers

Giovana Gavidia-Bovadilla et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Incipient Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is characterized by a slow onset of clinical symptoms, with pathological brain changes starting several years earlier. Consequently, it is necessary to first understand and differentiate age-related changes in brain regions in the absence of disease, and then to support early and accurate AD diagnosis. However, there is poor understanding of the initial stage of AD; seemingly healthy elderly brains lose matter in regions related to AD, but similar changes can also be found in non-demented subjects having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). By using a Linear Mixed Effects approach, we modelled the change of 166 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based biomarkers available at a 5-year follow up on healthy elderly control (HC, n = 46) subjects. We hypothesized that, by identifying their significant variant (vr) and quasi-variant (qvr) brain regions over time, it would be possible to obtain an age-based null model, which would characterize their normal atrophy and growth patterns as well as the correlation between these two regions. By using the null model on those subjects who had been clinically diagnosed as HC (n = 161), MCI (n = 209) and AD (n = 331), normal age-related changes were estimated and deviation scores (residuals) from the observed MRI-based biomarkers were computed. Subject classification, as well as the early prediction of conversion to MCI and AD, were addressed through residual-based Support Vector Machines (SVM) modelling. We found reductions in most cortical volumes and thicknesses (with evident gender differences) as well as in sub-cortical regions, including greater atrophy in the hippocampus. The average accuracies (ACC) recorded for men and women were: AD-HC: 94.11%, MCI-HC: 83.77% and MCI converted to AD (cAD)-MCI non-converter (sMCI): 76.72%. Likewise, as compared to standard clinical diagnosis methods, SVM classifiers predicted the conversion of cAD to be 1.9 years earlier for females (ACC:72.5%) and 1.4 years earlier for males (ACC:69.0%).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Proposed framework.
(A) HC subjects with normal CSF profile are identified from cutoff values calculated from CSF biomarkers distributions. (B) Longitudinal ROIs of these subjects are modelled using LME approach, variant (vr) and quasi-variant (qvr) ROIs and Y-intercepts (y0) ROIs values are identified and then null models for both genders are built from these values by applying multivariate modelling. (C) qvr ROIs values of new HC, MCI and AD subjects are used within null models to infer the y0 values of vr ROIs. Estimated ROIs values (y^) at different ages are estimated by linear regression by using y0 and β coefficients of age and education. Residuals are calculated as the difference y-y^; and finally, SVM classifiers are trained for subject classification and addressing the early diagnosis problem: HC vs MCI, MCI vs. AD and HC vs AD. The full workflow of last two stages is applied separately for each gender.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Boxplot of CSF biomarkers concentrations for dxcsf diagnostic groups.
(a) CSF-1 − 42; and (b) CSF-τ.

References

    1. Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010. January;9(1):119–128. Available from: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria; 2016. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vemuri P, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, Whitwell JL, Kantarci K, Knopman DS, et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies. Neuroimage. 2008. February;39(3):1186–1197. Available from: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frisoni GB, Fox NC, Jack CR, Scheltens P, Thompson PM. The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nature reviews Neurology. 2010;6(2):67–77. Available from: http://www.nature.com.ezproxy.usc.edu.au:2048/nrneurol/journal/v6/n2/ful.... 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saykin AJ, Shen L, Foroud TM, Potkin SG, Swaminathan S, Kim S, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative biomarkers as quantitative phenotypes: Genetics core aims, progress, and plans. Alzheimer’s & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2010. May;6(3):265–73. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2868595{&}tool.... 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms