Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169029.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169029. eCollection 2017.

Effect of Waterlogging Duration at Different Growth Stages on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton

Affiliations

Effect of Waterlogging Duration at Different Growth Stages on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton

Xiaosen Wang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In this study, a soil culture experiment was set up in barrels to investigate the effect of waterlogging duration at different growth stages on the growth, yield, and quality of cotton in the Huang-Huai Region of China during summer. The experiment was conducted at four growth stages of cotton (seedling, squaring, flowering, and boll opening), and the waterlogging duration at each stage was set to five levels (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 d) and the waterlogging depth was 5cm. Twenty different treatment combinations were established, and one group without waterlogging throughout the whole growth period was used as the control (CK). The results showed that the waterlogging treatments at the different growth stages reduced the morphological and yield parameters of the cotton plants as well as the physiological parameters of the cotton leaves, and the extent of the reduction in these parameters increased with the extension of the waterlogging duration. The effect of waterlogging at different growth stages on the cotton decreased in the order of the flowering, squaring, seedling, and boll-opening stages, and the highest yield reduction rates for the four stages were 38.8%, 27.9%, 18.3%, and 7.6% respectively. Additionally, waterlogging decreased the quality parameters of cotton such as the upper-half mean length, uniformity index, micronaire value, elongation, yellowness, and lint percentage at the squaring, flowering, and boll-opening stages. Furthermore, at the seedling stage waterlogging for no more than 6 d allowed the morphological and yield parameters to recover in the boll-opening stage upon timely drainage, and these parameters showed no significant decreases compared with the CK level. The critical duration of waterlogging at the squaring stage was 4 d. However, at the flowering stage, even 2 d of waterlogging could lead to the stagnation of morphological development and prevent the recovery of the cotton yield to the CK level. Therefore, when waterlogging disasters occur in cotton fields, the implementation of appropriate surface and subsurface drainage schemes for the different growth stages is needed as soon as possible to mitigate the damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The immediate effects of various waterlogging durations at the different growth stages on the plant heights (A) and leaf areas (B) of cotton. The statistical analysis is one way ANOVA, and different letters on bars within the same growth stage are significantly different at P = 0.05 probability level.
Fig 2
Fig 2
The final effects of various waterlogging durations at the different growth stages on the plant heights (A) and leaf areas (B) of cotton. The statistical analysis is two way ANOVA, and Different letters on bars are significantly different at P = 0.05 probability level.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The chlorophyll content (SPAD VALUE) (A) and photosynthetic rate (B) of the cotton with the waterlogging treatments at the squaring and flowering stages. The statistical analysis is one way ANOVA.

References

    1. Ashraf MA, Ahmad MSA, Asharf M, Al-Qurainy F, Ashraf MY. Alleviation of waterlogging stress in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L:) by exogenous application of potassium in soil and as a foliar spray. Crop Pasture Sci. 2011; 62: 25–38.
    1. Cao G, Wang XG, Liu Y, Luo WB. Effect of water logging stress on cotton leaf area index and yield. Procedia Engineering. 2012; 28:202–209.
    1. Christianson JA, Llewellyn DJ, Dennis ES, Wilson IW. Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in roots and leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51 (1): 21–37. 10.1093/pcp/pcp163 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dodd K, Guppy CN, Lockwood PV, Rochester IJ. Impact of waterlogging on the nutrition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L:) produced in sodic soils. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013;64: 816–824.
    1. Hodgson AS, Chan KY. The Effect of Short-term Waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1982;33: 109–116.