Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-3024-4.

Perioperative changes in osteopontin and TGFβ1 plasma levels and their prognostic impact for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

Affiliations

Perioperative changes in osteopontin and TGFβ1 plasma levels and their prognostic impact for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

Bülent Polat et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In head and neck cancer little is known about the kinetics of osteopontin (OPN) expression after tumor resection. In this study we evaluated the time course of OPN plasma levels before and after surgery.

Methods: Between 2011 and 2013 41 consecutive head and neck cancer patients were enrolled in a prospective study (group A). At different time points plasma samples were collected: T0) before, T1) 1 day, T2) 1 week and T3) 4 weeks after surgery. Osteopontin and TGFβ1 plasma concentrations were measured with a commercial ELISA system. Data were compared to 131 head and neck cancer patients treated with primary (n = 42) or postoperative radiotherapy (n = 89; group B1 and B2).

Results: A significant OPN increase was seen as early as 1 day after surgery (T0 to T1, p < 0.01). OPN levels decreased to base line 3-4 weeks after surgery. OPN values were correlated with postoperative TGFβ1 expression suggesting a relation to wound healing. Survival analysis showed a significant benefit for patients with lower OPN levels both in the primary and postoperative radiotherapy group (B1: 33 vs 11.5 months, p = 0.017, B2: median not reached vs 33.4, p = 0.031). TGFβ1 was also of prognostic significance in group B1 (33.0 vs 10.7 months, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Patients with head and neck cancer showed an increase in osteopontin plasma levels directly after surgery. Four weeks later OPN concentration decreased to pre-surgery levels. This long lasting increase was presumably associated to wound healing. Both pretherapeutic osteopontin and TGFβ1 had prognostic impact.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; Osteopontin; Perioperative changes; Survival; TGFβ1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scheme of the three patient groups treated by A) surgery, B1) definite radio-chemotherapy and B2) surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Time points for blood samples are marked as T0 to T3 (T0, before surgery (group A) or before start of radiotherapy (group B1 and B2), T1, 1 day after surgery, T2, 1 week and T3, 3 to 4 weeks after surgery). S, surgery; RT, radiotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box and whisker plots demonstrate the distribution plasma levels of a) OPN and b) TGFβ1 in the different patient groups and healthy controls at time point T0 before treatment. Bars indicate statistical significant differences with p < 0.05
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time course of OPN plasma levels for group A with a) OPN and b) TGFβ1 (T0, before surgery, T1, 1 day after surgery, T2, 1 week and T3, 3 to 4 weeks after surgery). Bars indicate statistical significant differences with p < 0.05. c shows OPN time course for patients with OPN levels above or below median indicating that patients in both groups return to their pre-surgery status
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Positive correlation between TGFβ1 and OPN plasma levels at time point T0. Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.619, p = 0.001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan-Meier curves show overall survival for patients in group a (perioperative, A), group B1 (primary radiotherapy, b) and group B2 (postoperative RT, c) according to OPN at time point T0. When dichotomized by median or tertiles, patients with lower OPN had an improved overall survival. For TGFβ1 a difference in survival was seen in patients from group B1, showing a better survival for patients in the lower two tertiles (d)

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pignon JP, le Maitre A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, Group M-NC. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanchard P, Baujat B, Holostenco V, Bourredjem A, Baey C, Bourhis J, Pignon JP, Group M-CC Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): a comprehensive analysis by tumour site. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen-Tan PF, Zhang Q, Ang KK, Weber RS, Rosenthal DI, Soulieres D, et al. Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of efficacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3858–66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourhis J, Sire C, Graff P, Gregoire V, Maingon P, Calais G, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99–02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:145–53. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70346-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms