Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1941-1.

Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method

Affiliations

Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method

Miriam Hartveit et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Communication between involved parties is essential to ensure coordinated and safe health care delivery. However, existing literature reveals that the information relayed in the referral process is seen as insufficient by the receivers. It is unknown how this insufficiency affects the quality of care, and valid performance measures to explore it are lacking. The aim of the present study was to develop quality indicators to detect the impact that the quality of referral letters from primary care to specialised mental health care has on the quality of mental health services.

Methods: Using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, a systematic literature review and focus group interviews were conducted to define quality indicators for mental health care expected to be affected by the quality of referral information. Focus group participants included psychiatrists, psychologists, general practitioners, patient representatives and managers. The existing evidence and suggested indicators were presented to expert panels, who assessed the indicators by their validity, reliability, sensitivity and feasibility.

Results: Sixteen preliminary indicators emerged during the focus group interviews and literature review. The expert panels recommended four of the 16 indicators. The recommended indicators measure a) timely access, b) delay in the process of assessing the referral, c) delay in the onset of care and d) the appropriateness of the referral. Adjustment was necessary for five other indicators, and seven indicators were rejected because of expected confounding factors reducing their validity and sensitivity.

Conclusions: The quality of information relayed in the referral process from primary care to specialised mental health care is expected to affect a wide range of dimensions defining high quality care. The expected importance of the referral process for ensuring 'timely access'-one of the six aims of high-quality health care defined by the Institute of Medicine-is highlighted. Exploring the underlying mechanisms for the potential impact of referral information on patient outcomes is recommended to enhance quality of care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01374035 (28 April 2011).

Keywords: Mental health services; Process assessment (health care); Quality indicators, health care; Quality of health care; RAND appropriateness method; Referral and consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Durbin J, Barnsley J, Finlayson B, Jaakkimainen L, Lin E, Berta W, et al. Quality of Communication Between Primary Health Care and Mental Health Care: An Examination of Referral and Discharge Letters. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39(4):445–61. doi: 10.1007/s11414-012-9288-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akbari A, Mayhew A, Al-Alawi MA, Grimshaw J, Winkens R, Glidewell E, et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD005471. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiwa M, Dhaliwal S. Referral Writer: preliminary evidence for the value of comprehensive referral letters. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(1):39–45. - PubMed
    1. Shaw I, Smith KMC, Middleton H, Woodward L. A letter of consequence: referral letters from general practitioners to secondary mental health services. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):116. doi: 10.1177/1049732304270725. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, Chin GS, Ibrahim JE. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):272–7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024570. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data