Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 23:5:166-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.017. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Efficacy of self-sampling in promoting participation to cervical cancer screening also in subsequent round

Affiliations

Efficacy of self-sampling in promoting participation to cervical cancer screening also in subsequent round

Annarosa Del Mistro et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Offering self-sampling devices improves participation of under-screened women. We evaluated participation in routine screening following the self-sampling intervention in two organized population-based screening programmes located in North-East Italy. Data on participation at 3-years-interval after a randomized clinical trial assessing the response to two strategies offering self-samplers (sent at home or offered free at local pharmacy) with a control action (sending reminders for a cervical specimen taken at the clinic) in 30-64 yr-old women non-respondent to the regular call-recall invitation were analyzed. Up to April 2016, 2300 women out of the 2995 recruited in the trial in 2011 were re-invited to perform a screening test at clinic; overall, 698 women adhered. Participation was similar in the three arms (29-32%), and highest (47-68%) among those who participated in the previous round. Over the two rounds, 44.6%, 32.3% and 30.3% women had at least one test in the self-sampling at home, self-sampling at pharmacy and test at the clinic arms, respectively. Our data indicate that the beneficial effect of offering self-sampling devices to nonparticipating women is maintained over time. Self-samplers are useful to increase overall coverage; their sporadic use does not seem to increase the proportion of women regularly repeating the test.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; HPV test; Participation; Screening; Self-sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study conducted in two organized population-based screening programmes located in North-East Italy; self-sampling trial round (1st round) and subsequent round (2nd) after three years, by original study arms and by participation. N = number of women.

References

    1. Arbyn M., Castle P.E. Offering self-sampling kits for HPV testing to reach women who do not attend in the regular cervical cancer screening program. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2015;24:2015. (Published online first February) - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M., Castellsaguè X., de Sanjosè S. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann. Oncol. 2011;22:2675–2686. - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M., Ronco G., Anttila A. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine. 2012;30S:F88–F99. - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M., Verdoodt F., Snijders P.J.F. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:172–183. - PubMed
    1. Del Mistro A., Frayle H., Ferro A. Cervical cancer screening by high risk HPV testing in routine practice: results at one year recall of high risk HPV-positive and cytology-negative women. J. Med. Screen. 2014;21:30–37. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources