Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;17(3):461-474.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0491-7.

The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition

Marta Vergara-Martínez  1 , Montserrat Comesaña  2 , Manuel Perea  3   4
Affiliations

The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition

Marta Vergara-Martínez et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Behavioral experiments have revealed that words appearing in many different contexts are responded to faster than words that appear in few contexts. Although this contextual diversity (CD) effect has been found to be stronger than the word-frequency (WF) effect, it is a matter of debate whether the facilitative effects of CD and WF reflect the same underlying mechanisms. The analysis of the electrophysiological correlates of CD may shed some light on this issue. This experiment is the first to examine the ERPs to high- and low-CD words when WF is controlled for. Results revealed that while high-CD words produced faster responses than low-CD words, their ERPs showed larger negativities (225-325 ms) than low-CD words. This result goes in the opposite direction of the ERP WF effect (high-frequency words elicit smaller N400 amplitudes than low-frequency words). The direction and scalp distribution of the CD effect resembled the ERP effects associated with "semantic richness." Thus, while apparently related, CD and WF originate from different sources during the access of lexical-semantic representations.

Keywords: Contextual diversity; ERPs; Lexical organization; Word recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 02;5(6):e10729 - PubMed
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Jun;11(3):434-9 - PubMed
    1. Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 21;1:218 - PubMed
    1. Psychophysiology. 1989 Jul;26(4):431-6 - PubMed
    1. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):1024-37 - PubMed

Publication types