Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
- PMID: 28051074
- PMCID: PMC5315519
- DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.188
Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
Abstract
This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The sample included healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom from different medical specialties (clinical genetics, other 'mainstream' specialties now offering genetic testing), and scientists from regional genetics laboratories. While viewing recontacting as desirable under certain circumstances, most respondents expressed concerns about its feasibility within the current constraints of the National Health Service (NHS). The main barriers identified were insufficient resources (time, staff, and suitable IT infrastructures) and lack of clarity about role boundaries and responsibilities. All of these are further complicated by genetic testing being increasingly offered by mainstream specialties. Reaching a consensus about roles and responsibilities of clinical specialties with regard to recontacting former patients in the light of evolving genetic information, and about what resources and infrastructures would be needed, was generally seen as a pre-requisite to developing guidelines about recontact.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Recontacting clinical genetics patients with reclassified results: equity and policy challenges.Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):505-506. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0313-1. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019. PMID: 30568242 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Bombard and Mighton.Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):507-508. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0315-z. Epub 2019 Jan 18. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019. PMID: 30659262 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Rosenthal ET, Bowles KR, Pruss D et al: Exceptions to the rule: Case studies in the prediction of pathogenicity for genetic variants in hereditary cancer genes. Clin Genet 2015; 88: 533–541. - PubMed
-
- Otten E, Plantinga M, Birnie E et al: Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2014; 17: 668–678. - PubMed
-
- Pelias MZ: Duty to disclose in medical genetics: a legal perspective. Am J Med Genet 1991; 39: 347–354. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical