Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;67(3):418-529.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312223. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

Cancer incidence and mortality risks in a large US Barrett's oesophagus cohort

Affiliations

Cancer incidence and mortality risks in a large US Barrett's oesophagus cohort

Michael B Cook et al. Gut. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Barrett's oesophagus (BE) increases the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma by 10-55 times that of the general population, but no community-based cancer-specific incidence and cause-specific mortality risk estimates exist for large cohorts in the USA.

Design: Within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), we identified patients with BE diagnosed during 1995-2012. KPNC cancer registry and mortality files were used to estimate standardised incidence ratios (SIR), standardised mortality ratios (SMR) and excess absolute risks.

Results: There were 8929 patients with BE providing 50 147 person-years of follow-up. Compared with the greater KPNC population, patients with BE had increased risks of any cancer (SIR=1.40, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.49), which slightly decreased after excluding oesophageal cancer. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk was increased 24 times, which translated into an excess absolute risk of 24 cases per 10 000 person-years. Although oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk decreased with time since BE diagnosis, oesophageal cancer mortality did not, indicating that the true risk is stable and persistent with time. Relative risks of cardia and stomach cancers were increased, but excess absolute risks were modest. Risks of colorectal, lung and prostate cancers were unaltered. All-cause mortality was slightly increased after excluding oesophageal cancer (SMR=1.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.31), but time-stratified analyses indicated that this was likely attributable to diagnostic bias. Cause-specific SMRs were elevated for ischaemic heart disease (SMR=1.39, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.63), respiratory system diseases (SMR=1.51, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.75) and digestive system diseases (SMR=2.20 95% CI 1.75 to 2.75).

Conclusions: Patients with BE had a persistent excess risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma over time, although their absolute excess risks for this cancer, any cancer and overall mortality were modest.

Keywords: BARRETT'S METAPLASIA; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot summarizing the standardized incidence ratios of cancer risk in the Barrett’s esophagus cohort relative to the greater KPNC population. The filled circles represent the risk estimates on a linear scale while the horizontal lines demarcate the extent of the 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line demarcates the null hypothesis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California; SIR, standardized incidence ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot summarizing the excess absolute cancer risks per 10,000 person years for the Barrett’s esophagus cohort relative to the greater KPNC population. The filled circles represent the risk estimates on a linear scale while the horizontal lines demarcate the extent of the 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line demarcates the null hypothesis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EAR, excess absolute risk; KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot summarizing the standardized mortality ratios in the Barrett’s esophagus cohort relative to the greater KPNC population. The filled circles represent the risk estimates on a linear scale while the horizontal lines demarcate the extent of the 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line demarcates the null hypothesis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot summarizing the excess absolute mortality risks per 10,000 person years for the Barrett’s esophagus cohort relative to the greater KPNC population. The filled circles represent the risk estimates on a linear scale while the horizontal lines demarcate the extent of the 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line demarcates the null hypothesis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EAR, excess absolute risk; KPNC, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

References

    1. Spechler SJ, Robbins AH, Rubins HB, et al. Adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. An overrated risk? Gastroenterology. 1984;87:927–33. - PubMed
    1. Polepalle SC, McCallum RW. Barrett’s esophagus. Current assessment and future perspectives. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990;19:733–44. - PubMed
    1. van der Burgh A, Dees J, Hop WC, et al. Oesophageal cancer is an uncommon cause of death in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 1996;39:5–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rana PS, Johnston DA. Incidence of adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus diagnosed between 1976 and 1986: implications for endoscopic surveillance. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13:28–31. - PubMed
    1. Conio M, Cameron AJ, Romero Y, et al. Secular trends in the epidemiology and outcome of Barrett’s oesophagus in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gut. 2001;48:304–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types