Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 24;1(3):137-140.
doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.30085. eCollection 2014.

Investigation of the efficacy of transobturator tape (TOT) surgery in stress urinary incontinence

Affiliations

Investigation of the efficacy of transobturator tape (TOT) surgery in stress urinary incontinence

Mehmet Suhha Bostanci et al. North Clin Istanb. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transobturator vaginal tape (TOT) in the management women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and to analyze functional results and subjective cure rates at follow- up visits.

Methods: Eighty-three consecutive women with SUI underwent TOT procedure. Data related to operative time, pre- and post-operative complications were collected. Subjective cure was defined as the absence of any urine loss on physical activity.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 53.2 years, and 66.3% of the patients had pure SUI. The mean operative time was 24.96 min in cases of isolated SUI treatment. The mean hospital stay was 1.53±0.68 days. At a mean follow-up of 32.8 months, the median subjective cure rate was 68.7 percent. Bladder injury (8.4%) was the only short and long term complication of this procedure.

Conclusion: TOT is a safe and effective procedure for SUI with a low rate of long- term complications. The short -term complication like bladder perforation may develop based on the experience of the surgeons or concomitant pelvic surgery.

Keywords: Complication; stress urinary incontinence; transobturator vaginal tape (TOT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. - PubMed
    1. Botlero R, Urquhart DM, Davis SR, Bell RJ. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. Int J Urol. 2008;15:230–4. - PubMed
    1. Foldspang A, Mommsen S, Lam GW, Elving L. Parity as a correlate of adult female urinary incontinence prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992;46:595–600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirss F, Lang K, Toompere K, Veerus P. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Estonian postmenopausal women. Springerplus. 2013;2:524. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7:81–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources