Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy
- PMID: 2806022
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02552271
Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy
Abstract
A comparison, based on results from anal manometry and continence, was made between eight patients after circular stapled ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy (Js) and seven patients after endoanal mucosal proctectomy and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Jm). The mean and range from ileostomy closure were 3.5 months (1.5 to 12) and 21.7 months (13 to 32), respectively. The mean maximum resting pressure (MRP) ( +/- SEM and range) was 81.3 mm Hg ( +/- 6.0 and 61 to 112.5) and 50.0 mm Hg ( +/- 6.2 and 17 to 62.5), respectively, for the Js and Jm groups (P less than .003). None of the Js patients experienced leakage or wore a pad, while in the Jm group 14 percent experienced minor leakage during the day and 28 percent at night. Seventy-one percent of the Jm group wore a pad at some point. Anal sphincter resting pressures and continence were better in the Js group. The improvement in MRP resulted from avoidance of injury to the internal and sphincter during dilatation and mucosectomy and the maintenance of a normal anal canal that allowed for proper closure.
Similar articles
-
Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation.Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):90-5; discussion 95-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90366-l. Am J Surg. 1991. PMID: 1987862
-
Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Jan;34(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02050200. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991. PMID: 1846800
-
Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Dec;83(12):1089-92. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991. PMID: 1813639 Free PMC article.
-
The results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: the manometric assessment of pouch continence and its reservoir function.World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):872-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02066984. World J Surg. 1992. PMID: 1462622 Review.
-
[Surgical indications and reconstructive techniques in the treatment of chronic forms of ulcerative rectocolitis. Review of the literature].Minerva Chir. 1996 May;51(5):329-36. Minerva Chir. 1996. PMID: 9072741 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.Ann Surg. 2000 Oct;232(4):530-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00008. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 10998651 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):221-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000080825.95166.26. Ann Surg. 2003. PMID: 12894015 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):10-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00337578. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995. PMID: 7745315
-
Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery.Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):262-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000152018.99541.f1. Ann Surg. 2005. PMID: 15650636 Free PMC article.
-
Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.Surg Today. 2000;30(7):575-81. doi: 10.1007/s005950070095. Surg Today. 2000. PMID: 10930221
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources