Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Apr;53(4):682-692.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations

Gabrielle B Rocque et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Advance care planning (ACP) improves alignment between patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment and care received at end of life (EOL).

Objectives: To evaluate implementation of lay navigator-led ACP.

Methods: A convergent, parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate implementation of navigator-led ACP across 12 cancer centers. Data collection included 1) electronic navigation records, 2) navigator surveys (n = 45), 3) claims-based patient outcomes (n = 820), and 4) semistructured navigator interviews (n = 26). Outcomes of interest included 1) the number of ACP conversations completed, 2) navigator self-efficacy, 3) patient resource utilization, hospice use, and chemotherapy at EOL, and 4) navigator-perceived barriers and facilitators to ACP.

Results: From June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, 50 navigators completed Respecting Choices® First Steps ACP Facilitator training. Navigators approached 18% of patients (1319/8704); 481 completed; 472 in process; 366 declined. Navigators were more likely to approach African American patients than Caucasian patients (20% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Significant increases in ACP self-efficacy were observed after training. The mean score for feeling prepared to conduct ACP conversations increased from 5.6/10 to 7.5/10 (P < 0.001). In comparison with patients declining ACP participation (n = 171), decedents in their final 30 days of life who engaged in ACP (n = 437) had fewer hospitalizations (46% vs. 56%, P = 0.02). Key facilitators of successful implementation included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and prior ACP experience; barriers included space limitations, identifying the "right" time to start conversations, and personal discomfort discussing EOL.

Conclusion: A navigator-led ACP program was feasible and may be associated with lower rates of resource utilization near EOL.

Keywords: Advance care planning; end of life; lay navigation; lay navigator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mixed-method study schema. PCCP = Patient Care Connect Program; ACP = advance care planning.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Self-efficacy results. ACP = advance care planning.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peppercorn JM, et al., American society of clinical oncology statement: toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(6): p. 755–60. - PubMed
    1. Medicine, I.o., Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life, ed. T.N.A. Press; 2014, Washington D.C.
    1. Silveira MJ, Wiitala W, and Piette J, Advance directive completion by elderly Americans: a decade of change. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014. 62(4): p. 706–10. - PubMed
    1. Organization, N.H.a.P.C. Advance Care Planning. 2016. [cited 2016 3/9/16]; Available from: http://www.nhpco.org/advance-care-planning.
    1. Detering KM, et al., The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2010. 340: p. c1345. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources