Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
- PMID: 28063613
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.006
Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of significant prostate (sPCa) locations being missed with magnetic resonance (MR)- and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy (Bx) may help to improve these techniques.
Objective: To identify the location of sPCa lesions being missed with MR- and TRUS-Bx.
Design, setting, and participants: In a referral center, 223 consecutive Bx-naive men with elevated prostate specific antigen level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination were included. Histopathologically-proven cancer locations, Gleason score, and tumor length were determined.
Intervention: All patients underwent multi-parametric MRI and 12-core systematic TRUS-Bx. MR-Bx was performed in all patients with suspicion of PCa on multi-parametric MRI (n=142).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Cancer locations were compared between MR- and TRUS-Bx. Proportions were expressed as percentages, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Results and limitations: In total, 191 lesions were found in 108 patients with sPCa. From these lesion 74% (141/191) were defined as sPCa on either MR- or TRUS-Bx. MR-Bx detected 74% (105/141) of these lesions and 61% (86/141) with TRUS-Bx. TRUS-Bx detected more lesions compared with MR-Bx (140 vs 109). However, these lesions were often low risk (39%). Significant lesions missed with MR-Bx most often had involvement of dorsolateral (58%) and apical (37%) segments and missed segments with TRUS-Bx were located anteriorly (79%), anterior midprostate (50%), and anterior apex (23%).
Conclusions: Both techniques have difficulties in detecting apical lesions. MR-Bx most often missed cancer with involvement of the dorsolateral part (58%) and TRUS-Bx with involvement of the anterior part (79%).
Patient summary: Both biopsy techniques miss cancer in specific locations within the prostate. Identification of these lesions may help to improve these techniques.
Keywords: Biopsy; Cancer; Location; MRI; Prostate.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: All That Glitters Is Not Gold!Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):904-906. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 13. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28094057 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous