Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;2(4):10.16966/2380-5536.127.
doi: 10.16966/2380-5536.127. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

HIV Care Providers' Attitudes regarding Mobile Phone Applications and Web-Based Dashboards to support Patient Self-Management and Care Coordination: Results from a Qualitative Feasibility Study

Affiliations

HIV Care Providers' Attitudes regarding Mobile Phone Applications and Web-Based Dashboards to support Patient Self-Management and Care Coordination: Results from a Qualitative Feasibility Study

Dallas Swendeman et al. J HIV AIDS. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare providers (HCPs) from five HIV medical care coordination teams in a large Los Angeles County HIV clinic, including physicians, nurses, and psychosocial services providers. HCPs reported on the potential utility, acceptability, and barriers for patient self-monitoring and notifications via mobile phones, and web-based dashboards for HCPs. Potential benefits included: 1) enhancing patient engagement, motivation, adherence, and self-management; and 2) improving provider-patient relationships and HCP care coordination. Newly diagnosed and patients with co-morbidities were highest priorities for mobile application support. Facilitators included universal mobile phone ownership and use of smartphones or text messaging. Patient-level barriers included concerns about low motivation and financial instability for consistent use by some patients. Organizational barriers, cited primarily by physicians, included concerns about privacy protections, easy dashboard access, non-integrated electronic records, and competing burdens in limited appointment times. Psychosocial services providers were most supportive of the proposed mobile tools.

Keywords: Care coordination; Co-morbidities; HIV care; Healthcare providers; Mobile phones; Psychosocial services providers; Self-management; Self-monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main Themes around Motivators and Barriers on Mobile Phone Applications to Support Patient Self-Management and Web-Based Dashboards for Care Coordination

References

    1. Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, et al. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:228–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis MM, Freeman M, Kaye J, Vuckovic N, Buckley DI. A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20:428–438. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health Adoption by Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;23:212–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vassilev I, Rowsell A, Pope C, Kennedy A, O’Cathain A. Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review. Implement Sci. 2015;10:59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinnock H, Slack R, Pagliari C, Price D, Sheikh A. Professional and patient attitudes to using mobile phone technology to monitor asthma: questionnaire survey. Prim Care Respir J. 2006;15:237–245. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources