Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 5;14(1):47.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010047.

Impact of Air Pollutants on Outpatient Visits for Acute Respiratory Outcomes

Affiliations

Impact of Air Pollutants on Outpatient Visits for Acute Respiratory Outcomes

Ran Li et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The air pollution in China is a severe problem. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of air pollutants on acute respiratory outcomes in outpatients. Outpatient data from 2 December 2013 to 1 December 2014 were collected, as well as air pollutant data including ozone (O₃), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). We screened six categories of acute respiratory outcomes and analyzed their associations with different air pollutant exposures, including upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), acute bronchitis (AB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), acute exacerbation of asthma (AE-asthma), and acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis (AEBX). A case-crossover design with a bidirectional control sampling approach was used for statistical analysis. A total of 57,144 patients were enrolled for analysis. PM2.5, PM10, NO₂, SO₂, and CO exposures were positively associated with outpatient visits for URTI, AB, CAP, and AEBX. PM10, SO₂, and CO exposures were positively associated with outpatient visits for AECOPD. Exposure to O₃ was positively associated with outpatient visits for AE-asthma, but negatively associated with outpatient visits for URTI, CAP, and AEBX. In conclusion, air pollutants had acute effects on outpatient visits for acute respiratory outcomes, with specific outcomes associated with specific pollutants.

Keywords: air pollutant; outpatient visit; respiratory outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation of different air pollutants throughout the study year in panels AF. (A) Variation of PM2.5 in the study year; (B) Variation of PM10 in the study year; (C) Variation of CO in the study year; (D) Variation of NO2 in the study year; (E) Variation of SO2 in the study year; (F) Variation of O3 in the study year; (G) Variation of AQI in the study year. Maximal concentrations of air pollutants occurred during cold periods, except for O3, which showed an inverse trend. Panel G shows the variation of the Chinese AQI, which is a composite measure of air pollutants.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation of different air pollutants throughout the study year in panels AF. (A) Variation of PM2.5 in the study year; (B) Variation of PM10 in the study year; (C) Variation of CO in the study year; (D) Variation of NO2 in the study year; (E) Variation of SO2 in the study year; (F) Variation of O3 in the study year; (G) Variation of AQI in the study year. Maximal concentrations of air pollutants occurred during cold periods, except for O3, which showed an inverse trend. Panel G shows the variation of the Chinese AQI, which is a composite measure of air pollutants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between CO and outpatient visits for different acute respiratory outcomes in panels AE. (A) Association between CO and outpatient visits for URTI; (B) Association between CO and outpatient visits for AB; (C) Association between CO and outpatient visits for CAP; (D) Association between CO and outpatient visits for AECOPD; (E) Association between CO and outpatient visits for AEBX. Horizontal axis represents the days lagged from 0–5, and vertical axis represented the odds ratios. The highest odds ratios appeared in the association with AECOPD in lag 0 (odd ratio (OR) = 1.188, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.056–1.335).

References

    1. Rohde R.A., Muller R.A. Air Pollution in China: Mapping of Concentrations and Sources. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135749. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faustini A., Stafoggia M., Colais P., Berti G., Bisanti L., Cadum E., Cernigliaro A., Mallone S., Scarnato C., Forastiere F., et al. Air pollution and multiple acute respiratory outcomes. Eur. Respir. J. 2013;42:304–313. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00128712. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yi Q., Hong Y.C., Kim H. Seasonal effect of PM(10) concentrations on mortality and morbidity in Seoul, Korea: A temperature-matched case-crossover analysis. Environ. Res. 2010;110:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medina-Ramon M., Zanobetti A., Schwartz J. The effect of ozone and PM10 on hospital admissions for pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A national multicity study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006;163:579–588. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zanobetti A., Schwartz J. Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2006;60:890–895. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039834. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources