Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0168659.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168659. eCollection 2017.

Microbiologically Confirmed Tuberculosis: Factors Associated with Pre-Treatment Loss to Follow-Up, and Time to Treatment Initiation

Affiliations

Microbiologically Confirmed Tuberculosis: Factors Associated with Pre-Treatment Loss to Follow-Up, and Time to Treatment Initiation

Judith Mwansa-Kambafwile et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The impact of new diagnostics on pre-treatment loss to follow up (Pre-treatment LTFU) has not been widely investigated. The reported rate of pre-treatment LTFU is however lower in studies where Xpert MTB/Rif (Xpert) has been used onsite as opposed to centrally. The use of the Xpert at point of care (POC) could have a role in reducing the pre-treatment LTFU rate among TB patients. We aimed to determine the pre-treatment LTFU rate and the time to treatment initiation as well as to describe associated factors in patients diagnosed with TB using POC Xpert or smear microscopy.

Method: Xpert machines were installed at 7 primary healthcare facilities in inner-city Johannesburg. POC Xpert TB testing was the primary diagnostic method for all patients although there were some patients who were tested using only laboratory-based smear microscopy (during power outages or machine operator off-sick). Data on patients' demographics, TB diagnostic test (Xpert or smear microscopy), test result, and time to treatment initiation were collected. Associations and predictors of pre-treatment LTFU and time to treatment initiation were explored.

Findings: A total of 1981 people with presumptive TB were tested (1743 using Xpert and 238 using smear). A bacteriological diagnosis of TB was made in 271 patients (90% Xpert; 10% smear). The median time to treatment initiation in the smear group was 9 days (IQR: 4-20) while those tested using Xpert had a median time of 0 days (IQR: 0-0). Pre-treatment LTFU was 22.5% with no difference between diagnostic groups (p = 0.8).

Conclusion: The Pre-treatment LTFU rate of 22.5% found in this study is much higher than the 5% target of the South African National TB Control Program. POC Xpert resulted in a significantly greater proportion of bacteriologically proven TB patients being started on treatment within 30 days of presentation. No risk factors associated with pre-treatment LTFU were identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Patient flow and eligibility chart.
Patients with presumptive TB tested for TB between October 2011 and March 2012 using either smear microscopy or Xpert were eligible.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the time to treatment initiation (in days) for all patients regardless of test method used.
It shows the proportion of TB patients initiated on treatment at different time points.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the time to treatment initiation (in days).
The broken line is showing proportion of TB patients diagnosed using smear while the continuous line is for patients diagnosed using Xpert.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the time to treatment initiation (in days).
It shows proportion of patients initiated on treatment at different time points for males (broken line) and for females (continuous line).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the time to treatment initiation by HIV status (in days).
The 3 groups are HIV positive (continuous line), HIV negative (broken line) and patients with unknown HIV status (broken line with dots).

References

    1. Organization WH. Global TB Report. 2015.
    1. Van Den Handel T, Hampton KH, Sanne I, Stevens W, Crous R, Van Rie A. The impact of Xpert® MTB/RIF in sparsely populated rural settings. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2015;19(4):392–8. 10.5588/ijtld.14.0653 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cox HS, Mbhele S, Mohess N, Whitelaw A, Muller O, Zemanay W, et al. Impact of Xpert MTB/RIF for TB diagnosis in a primary care clinic with high TB and HIV prevalence in South Africa: a pragmatic randomised trial. PLoS medicine. 2014;11(11):e1001760 Epub 2014/11/26. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4244039. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001760 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durovni B, Saraceni V, van den Hof S, Trajman A, Cordeiro-Santos M, Cavalcante S, et al. Impact of replacing smear microscopy with Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing tuberculosis in Brazil: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. PLoS medicine. 2014;11(12):e1001766 Epub 2014/12/10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4260794. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001766 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Churchyard GJ, Stevens WS, Mametja LD, McCarthy KM, Chihota V, Nicol MP, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF versus sputum microscopy as the initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis: a cluster-randomised trial embedded in South African roll-out of Xpert MTB/RIF. The Lancet Global health. 2015;3(8):e450–7. Epub 2015/07/19. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00100-X - DOI - PubMed