Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169909.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169909. eCollection 2017.

Predictive Factors for Pressure Ulcers in an Older Adult Population Hospitalized for Hip Fractures: A Prognostic Cohort Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predictive Factors for Pressure Ulcers in an Older Adult Population Hospitalized for Hip Fractures: A Prognostic Cohort Study

Paolo Chiari et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Older adult patients with fragility hip fractures constitute a population at high risk for complications, in particular pressure ulcers. The aim was to evaluate the incidence of pressure ulcers and potential predictive factors.

Methods and findings: A prospective multicentric prognostic cohort study in orthopedic wards in three Italian public hospitals. Participants were all consecutive patients 65 years of age or older diagnosed with a fragility hip fracture. Outcomes were incidence of pressure ulcers. The exposure variables were grouped into three macro areas in order to facilitate reading: "intrinsic" variables, "extrinsic" variables and variables linked to the organization of patient care. One thousand eighty-three older adult patients with fragility hip fractures were enrolled from October 1st, 2013 to January 31st, 2015, and pressure ulcers developed in 22.7%. At multivariate analysis, the following were found to be risk factors: age> 80 years (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; p = 0.015), the length of time a urinary catheter was used (OR 1.013; p<0.001), the length of time pain was present (OR 1.008; p = 0.008), the absence of side rails on the bed (OR 1.668; p = 0.026) and the use of a foam position valve (OR 1.025; p<0.001). Instead, the protective factors were the presence of a caregiver for at least half a day daily (OR 0.994; p = 0.012) and the number of positionings during the postoperative period (OR 0.897; p = 0.008).

Conclusions: The study allowed the identification of the patients most at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and the construction of a pragmatic predictive model using significant risk or protective factors in order to reduce the number of pressure ulcers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow Diagram of older adults.
Fig 2
Fig 2. ROC Curve of the Predictive Model of Pressure Ulcers in Patients with Hip Fractures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim SM, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yoon BK, Min YK, Lee DY et al. Prediction of survival, second fracture, and functional recovery following the first hip fracture surgery in older adult patients. Bone 2012;50(6):1343–50. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.633 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piscitelli P, Brandi ML, Chitano G, Argentiero A, Neglia C, Distante A, Saturnino L, Tarantino U. Epidemiology of fragility fractures in Italy. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011;8(2):29–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hung WW, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD, Siu AL. Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient. JAMA 2012;307(20):2185–94. 10.1001/jama.2012.4842 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patorno E, Patrick AR, Garry EM, Schneeweiss S, Gillet VG, Bartels DB et al. Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations. Diabetologia 2014;57(11):2237–50. 10.1007/s00125-014-3364-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler M, Forte ML, Joglekar SB, Swiontkowski MF, Kane RL. Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(12):1104–15. 10.2106/JBJS.J.00296 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types