Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;49(6):713-743.
doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000663. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND FAMILY PLANNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Affiliations
Review

WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND FAMILY PLANNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Ndola Prata et al. J Biosoc Sci. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature examining the relationship between women's empowerment and contraceptive use, unmet need for contraception and related family planning topics in developing countries. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Popline and Web of Science search engines in May 2013 to examine literature published between January 1990 and December 2012. Among the 46 articles included in the review, the majority were conducted in South Asia (n=24). Household decision-making (n=21) and mobility (n=17) were the most commonly examined domains of women's empowerment. Findings show that the relationship between empowerment and family planning is complex, with mixed positive and null associations. Consistently positive associations between empowerment and family planning outcomes were found for most family planning outcomes but those investigations represented fewer than two-fifths of the analyses. Current use of contraception was the most commonly studied family planning outcome, examined in more than half the analyses, but reviewed articles showed inconsistent findings. This review provides the first critical synthesis of the literature and assesses existing evidence between women's empowerment and family planning use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature review flow chart.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of all analysis by empowerment domain (N = 433).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of articles by family planning outcome (N = 46). Total number of outcomes (N = 65) exceeds the total number of articles as some articles examined multiple outcomes. Other family planning outcomes included eleven outcomes examined in eight articles: family planning knowledge (n = 3 articles), wife’s approval (n = 2 articles), advocacy, correct family planning ‘practice(s)’, effective use of method, contraceptive behaviour scales, fertility control and post-marriage contraceptive use interval (n = 1 articles each).

References

    1. Abadian S. Women’s autonomy and its impact on fertility. World Development. 1996;24(12):1793–1809.
    1. Ahmed S, Creanga AA, Gillespie DG, Tsui AO. Economic status, education and empowerment: implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Riyami A, Afifi M, Mabry RM. Women’s autonomy, education and employment in Oman and their influence on contraceptive use. Reproductive Health Matters. 2004;12(23):144–154. - PubMed
    1. Amin R, Hill RB, Li Y. Poor women’s participation in credit-based self-employment: the impact on their empowerment, fertility, contraceptive use, and fertility desire in rural Bangladesh. Pakistan Development Review. 1995;34:93–120.
    1. Amin R, Li YP, Ahmed AU. Women’s credit programs and family planning in rural Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives. 1996;22(4):158–162.