Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;93(1102):472-475.
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134005. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Coeliac disease screening is suboptimal in a tertiary gastroenterology setting

Affiliations

Coeliac disease screening is suboptimal in a tertiary gastroenterology setting

Heba Iskandar et al. Postgrad Med J. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background and aims: Coeliac disease (CD) is widely prevalent in North America, but case-finding techniques currently used may not be adequate for patient identification. We aimed to determine the adequacy of CD screening in an academic gastroenterology (GI) practice.

Methods: Consecutive initial visits to a tertiary academic GI practice were surveyed over a 3-month period as a fellow-initiated quality improvement project. All electronic records were reviewed to look for indications for CD screening according to published guidelines. The timing of screening was noted (before or after referral), as well as the screening method (serology or biopsy). Data were analysed to compare CD screening practices across subspecialty clinics.

Results: 616 consecutive patients (49±0.6 years, range 16-87 years, 58.5% females, 94% Caucasian) fulfilled inclusion criteria. CD testing was indicated in 336 (54.5%), but performed in only 145 (43.2%). The need for CD screening was highest in luminal GI and inflammatory bowel disease clinics, followed by biliary and hepatology clinics (p<0.0001); CD screening rate was highest in the luminal GI clinic (p=0.002). Of 145 patients screened, 4 patients (2.4%) had serology consistent with CD, of which 2 were proven by duodenal biopsy. Using this proportion, an additional 5 patients might have been diagnosed in 191 untested patients with indications for CD screening.

Conclusions: More than 50% of patients in a tertiary GI clinic have indications for CD screening, but <50% of indicated cases are screened. Case-finding techniques therefore are suboptimal, constituting a gap in patient care and an important target for future quality improvement initiatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for study. CD, coeliac disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coeliac disease (CD) testing indications. *Osteopenia, type 1 diabetes, first degree relative with CD, autoimmune diseases. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; GI, gastroenterology.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns in Celiac Disease.
    Cichewicz AB, Mearns ES, Taylor A, Boulanger T, Gerber M, Leffler DA, Drahos J, Sanders DS, Thomas Craig KJ, Lebwohl B. Cichewicz AB, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2095-2106. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05528-3. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Dig Dis Sci. 2019. PMID: 30820708 Review.

References

    1. Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1538–44. quiz 1537, 1545. - PubMed
    1. Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA. Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease. Gut. 2010;59:547–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, van Dyke CT, et al. Increasing incidence of Celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:818–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Louis-Jacques O, et al. Detection of Celiac disease in primary care: a multicenter case-finding study in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1454–60. - PubMed
    1. Lebwohl B, Rubio-Tapia A, Assiri A, et al. Diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22:661–77. - PMC - PubMed