Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Sep;30(9):1201-5.
doi: 10.1136/gut.30.9.1201.

Preference for hot drinks is associated with peptic disease

Affiliations

Preference for hot drinks is associated with peptic disease

R C Pearson et al. Gut. 1989 Sep.

Abstract

The temperature at which people chose to take a hot drink was measured in 59 patients with endoscopically proven peptic disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract and 65 asymptomatic controls. The patients in the disease group drank significantly hotter tea or coffee than the control group (medians 62 degrees and 56 degrees Celsius respectively, P less than 0.0001). The median temperatures of choice for subgroups of patients with oesophageal, gastric or duodenal disease were significantly higher than the control group (63.5 degrees, 63 degrees, 60.5 degrees C respectively). There was no relationship between a preference for hotter drinks with either the sex or smoking habits of the patient. In the control group the temperature of choice tended to decrease with age though linear regression just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06); this trend was not apparent in the disease group (p = 0.64). Thermal injury as a result of drinking hot fluids may be a causative factor in some peptic disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1956 Sep 15;271(6942):543-5 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1976 May 17;235(20):2198-200 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1979 Jun;39(6 Pt 2):2264-8 - PubMed
    1. Biorheology. 1976 Feb;13(1):49-58 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1957 Feb;93(2):259-65 - PubMed