Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Apr;122(4):294-302.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0720-8. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software

Gian Marco Conte et al. Radiol Med. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE) are useful tools in the diagnosis and follow-up of brain gliomas; nevertheless, both techniques leave the open issue of data reproducibility. We evaluated the reproducibility of data obtained using two different commercial software for perfusion maps calculation and analysis, as one of the potential sources of variability can be the software itself.

Methods: DSC and DCE analyses from 20 patients with gliomas were tested for both the intrasoftware (as intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility) and the intersoftware reproducibility, as well as the impact of different postprocessing choices [vascular input function (VIF) selection and deconvolution algorithms] on the quantification of perfusion biomarkers plasma volume (Vp), volume transfer constant (K trans) and rCBV. Data reproducibility was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: For all the biomarkers, the intra- and interobserver reproducibility resulted in almost perfect agreement in each software, whereas for the intersoftware reproducibility the value ranged from 0.311 to 0.577, suggesting fair to moderate agreement; Bland-Altman analysis showed high dispersion of data, thus confirming these findings. Comparisons of different VIF estimation methods for DCE biomarkers resulted in ICC of 0.636 for K trans and 0.662 for Vp; comparison of two deconvolution algorithms in DSC resulted in an ICC of 0.999.

Conclusions: The use of single software ensures very good intraobserver and interobservers reproducibility. Caution should be taken when comparing data obtained using different software or different postprocessing within the same software, as reproducibility is not guaranteed anymore.

Keywords: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE); Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC); Gliomas; Perfusion weighted MRI; Reproducibility of findings; Vascular input function (VIF).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(5):647-54 - PubMed
    1. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jun;16(6):880-8 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):801-11 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec;23(12):3456-65 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1176-1185 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources