Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 10;12(1):e0169515.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169515. eCollection 2017.

Testing the Efficacy of DNA Barcodes for Identifying the Vascular Plants of Canada

Affiliations

Testing the Efficacy of DNA Barcodes for Identifying the Vascular Plants of Canada

Thomas W A Braukmann et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Their relatively slow rates of molecular evolution, as well as frequent exposure to hybridization and introgression, often make it difficult to discriminate species of vascular plants with the standard barcode markers (rbcL, matK, ITS2). Previous studies have examined these constraints in narrow geographic or taxonomic contexts, but the present investigation expands analysis to consider the performance of these gene regions in discriminating the species in local floras at sites across Canada. To test identification success, we employed a DNA barcode reference library with sequence records for 96% of the 5108 vascular plant species known from Canada, but coverage varied from 94% for rbcL to 60% for ITS2 and 39% for matK. Using plant lists from 27 national parks and one scientific reserve, we tested the efficacy of DNA barcodes in identifying the plants in simulated species assemblages from six biogeographic regions of Canada using BLAST and mothur. Mean pairwise distance (MPD) and mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD) were strong predictors of barcode performance for different plant families and genera, and both metrics supported ITS2 as possessing the highest genetic diversity. All three genes performed strongly in assigning the taxa present in local floras to the correct genus with values ranging from 91% for rbcL to 97% for ITS2 and 98% for matK. However, matK delivered the highest species discrimination (~81%) followed by ITS2 (~72%) and rbcL (~44%). Despite the low number of plant taxa in the Canadian Arctic, DNA barcodes had the least success in discriminating species from this biogeographic region with resolution ranging from 36% with rbcL to 69% with matK. Species resolution was higher in the other settings, peaking in the Woodland region at 52% for rbcL and 87% for matK. Our results indicate that DNA barcoding is very effective in identifying Canadian plants to a genus, and that it performs well in discriminating species in regions where floristic diversity is highest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Coverage by barcode locus for the plant communities at 28 Canadian localities.
The number of plant species present at each site is indicated in parentheses.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Boxplots of MPD and MNTD for rbcL, matK, and ITS2.
Boxplots comparing MPD and MNTD for the vascular plant families of Canada for rbcL, matK, and ITS2. Significance (p–adjusted < 0.005) is indicated with an asterisk(s).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Species resolution for the three DNA barcodes (rbcL, matK, and ITS2).
Species resolution for the three DNA barcodes (rbcL, matK, and ITS2) based on A) BLAST, B) mothur with a posterior probability cut–off 0.95 or C) the actual species resolution of mothur. Species resolution in the six biogeographic regions obtained with D) rbcL, E) matK, F) ITS2.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Level of taxonomic resolution provided by rbcL, matK or ITS2 for 25 families.
Level of taxonomic resolution provided by rbcL, matK or ITS2 for 25 families of vascular plant that are species-rich in Canada. The three colours show the proportion of species identified to a family (blue), genus (orange) or species (green) level.

References

    1. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1512): 313–321 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLOS One 2011; 6(5): e19254 10.1371/journal.pone.0019254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santamaria M, Vicario S, Pappadà G, Scioscia G, Scazzocchio C, Saccone C. Towards barcode markers in Fungi: an intron map of Ascomycota mitochondria. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10 Suppl 6: S15 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madriñán S, Petersen G. A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon. 2007; 56(2): 295–299
    1. CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106(31): 12794–12797 10.1073/pnas.0905845106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources