Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0575-z.

Experiencing integration: a qualitative pilot study of consumer and provider experiences of integrated primary health care in Australia

Affiliations

Experiencing integration: a qualitative pilot study of consumer and provider experiences of integrated primary health care in Australia

Michelle Banfield et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The terms integration and integrated care describe the complex, patient-centred strategies to improve coordination of healthcare services. Frameworks exist to conceptualise these terms, but these have been developed from a professional viewpoint. The objective of this study was to explore consumers' and providers' concepts, expectations and experience of integrated care. A key focus was whether frameworks developed from a professional perspective are effective models to explore people's experiences.

Methods: A qualitative pilot study was undertaken at one Australian multidisciplinary primary health care centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with consumers (N = 19) and staff (N = 10). Data were analysed using a framework analysis approach.

Results: Consumers' experience of integrated care tended to be implicit in their descriptions of primary healthcare experiences more broadly. Experiences related to the typologies involved clinical and functional integration, such as continuity of providers and the usefulness of shared information. Staff focused on clinical level integration, but also talked about a cultural shift that demonstrated normative, professional and functional integration.

Conclusions: Existing frameworks for integration have been heavily influenced by the provider and organisational perspectives. They are useful for conceptualising integration from a professional perspective, but are less relevant for consumers' experiences. Consumers of integrated primary health care may be more focussed on relational aspects of care and outcomes of care.

Keywords: Consumer experience; Integration; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications--a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.67. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care? Policy summary 11. [http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory/publications/po...]. Accessed 31 Aug 2015.
    1. Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armitage GD, Suter E, Oelke ND, Adair CE. Health systems integration: state of the evidence. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e82. doi: 10.5334/ijic.316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Integrated Care: What Policies Support and Influence Integration in Health Care in Australia [http://www.phcris.org.au/researchevidence/item.php?id=8413&spindex=14]. Accessed 29 Sept 2015.

LinkOut - more resources