Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 11;8(1):12-34.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150.

Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration

Amy Y Tsou  1 , Christoph U Lehmann, Jeremy Michel, Ronni Solomon, Lorraine Possanza, Tejal Gandhi
Affiliations

Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration

Amy Y Tsou et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT).

Objective: To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste.

Methods: The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices.

Results: The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66% to 90% of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6% of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review.

Conclusion: Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.

Keywords: Copy and paste; clinical documentation; electronic health records; health policy; information technology; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Copy and Paste Best Practice Recommendations and Associated Sociotechnical Model Components. The different components of the model are keyed to recommendations A, B, C, and D.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. O’Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, Callahan MA, Adelman RD, Siegler EL. Physicians’ attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24(1): 63-68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606–008–0843–2. PubMed PMID: 18998191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appropriate use of the copy and paste functionality in electronic health records. Chicago (IL): American Health Information Management Association; 2014; 7p Available from: http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_05062...
    1. Shoolin JS, Ozeran L, Hamann C, Bria W., II Association of medical directors of information systems consensus on inpatient electronic health record documentation. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4(2):293–303. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013–02-R-0012. PubMed PMID: 23874365. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Office of Inspector General. Not all recommended fraud safeguards have been implemented in hospital EHR technology. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013. December 27 p. Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01–11–00570.pdf.
    1. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19(Suppl. 3): i68-i74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042085. PubMed PMID: 20959322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types