Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169758.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169758. eCollection 2017.

WiseEye: Next Generation Expandable and Programmable Camera Trap Platform for Wildlife Research

Affiliations

WiseEye: Next Generation Expandable and Programmable Camera Trap Platform for Wildlife Research

Sajid Nazir et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The widespread availability of relatively cheap, reliable and easy to use digital camera traps has led to their extensive use for wildlife research, monitoring and public outreach. Users of these units are, however, often frustrated by the limited options for controlling camera functions, the generation of large numbers of images, and the lack of flexibility to suit different research environments and questions. We describe the development of a user-customisable open source camera trap platform named 'WiseEye', designed to provide flexible camera trap technology for wildlife researchers. The novel platform is based on a Raspberry Pi single-board computer and compatible peripherals that allow the user to control its functions and performance. We introduce the concept of confirmatory sensing, in which the Passive Infrared triggering is confirmed through other modalities (i.e. radar, pixel change) to reduce the occurrence of false positives images. This concept, together with user-definable metadata, aided identification of spurious images and greatly reduced post-collection processing time. When tested against a commercial camera trap, WiseEye was found to reduce the incidence of false positive images and false negatives across a range of test conditions. WiseEye represents a step-change in camera trap functionality, greatly increasing the value of this technology for wildlife research and conservation management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Raspberry Pi with the core components of WiseEye and examples of sensors and peripherals that could be added.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The WiseEye system.
(a) Simplified diagram showing inter-connection of components with red lines indicating the power supply and green lines depicting the control/information flow from/to Raspberry Pi. (b) Inside view of WiseEye. The waterproof box has the dimension of 150 x 200 x 80 mm.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The layout of the roof top study area, showing the positions of the cameras and the detection zone and camera field of view for WiseEye.
The numbers on the grid represent the number and locations of False Positive events outside the field of view of the camera.
Fig 4
Fig 4. The image processing steps to determine whether an actual target object is present in the field of view by comparing the motion-activated image with a background image.
(a) A time-lapse image (with no target) used for subsequent operations as a background image. The Region of Interest (RoI) to be used for image processing is indicated by a red dashed rectangle. (b) motion-activated image showing the objects of interest and RoI. (c) Difference image between the RoI of (a) and (b), showing the birds as clusters of white “difference” pixels.

Similar articles

  • EventFinder: a program for screening remotely captured images.
    Janzen M, Ritter A, Walker PD, Visscher DR. Janzen M, et al. Environ Monit Assess. 2019 May 31;191(6):406. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7518-9. Environ Monit Assess. 2019. PMID: 31152251
  • Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner's perspective.
    Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, van der Wal R. Newey S, et al. Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):624-35. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0713-1. Ambio. 2015. PMID: 26508349 Free PMC article.
  • Large-scale and long-term wildlife research and monitoring using camera traps: a continental synthesis.
    Bruce T, Amir Z, Allen BL, Alting BF, Amos M, Augusteyn J, Ballard GA, Behrendorff LM, Bell K, Bengsen AJ, Bennett A, Benshemesh JS, Bentley J, Blackmore CJ, Boscarino-Gaetano R, Bourke LA, Brewster R, Brook BW, Broughton C, Buettel JC, Carter A, Chiu-Werner A, Claridge AW, Comer S, Comte S, Connolly RM, Cowan MA, Cross SL, Cunningham CX, Dalziell AH, Davies HF, Davis J, Dawson SJ, Di Stefano J, Dickman CR, Dillon ML, Doherty TS, Driessen MM, Driscoll DA, Dundas SJ, Eichholtzer AC, Elliott TF, Elsworth P, Fancourt BA, Fardell LL, Faris J, Fawcett A, Fisher DO, Fleming PJS, Forsyth DM, Garza-Garcia AD, Geary WL, Gillespie G, Giumelli PJ, Gracanin A, Grantham HS, Greenville AC, Griffiths SR, Groffen H, Hamilton DG, Harriott L, Hayward MW, Heard G, Heiniger J, Helgen KM, Henderson TJ, Hernandez-Santin L, Herrera C, Hirsch BT, Hohnen R, Hollings TA, Hoskin CJ, Hradsky BA, Humphrey JE, Jennings PR, Jones ME, Jordan NR, Kelly CL, Kennedy MS, Knipler ML, Kreplins TL, L'Herpiniere KL, Laurance WF, Lavery TH, Le Pla M, Leahy L, Leedman A, Legge S, Leitão AV, Letnic M, Liddell MJ, Lieb ZE, Linley GD, Lisle AT, Lohr CA, Maitz N, Marshall KD, Mason RT, Matheus-Holland DF, McComb LB, McDonald … See abstract for full author list ➔ Bruce T, et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Apr;100(2):530-555. doi: 10.1111/brv.13152. Epub 2025 Jan 17. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025. PMID: 39822039 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Semi-automated camera trap image processing for the detection of ungulate fence crossing events.
    Janzen M, Visser K, Visscher D, MacLeod I, Vujnovic D, Vujnovic K. Janzen M, et al. Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Sep 27;189(10):527. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6206-x. Environ Monit Assess. 2017. PMID: 28956203
  • Software to facilitate and streamline camera trap data management: A review.
    Young S, Rode-Margono J, Amin R. Young S, et al. Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep 6;8(19):9947-9957. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4464. eCollection 2018 Oct. Ecol Evol. 2018. PMID: 30386588 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Van der Wal R, Arts K. Digital conservation: An introduction. Ambio. 2015;44 (Suppl 4): 517–521. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rowcliffe JM, Field J, Turvey ST, Carbone C. Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45: 1228–1236.
    1. O'Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, editors. Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. New York: Springer; 2011.
    1. Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, et al. How suitable are recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research? Ambio. 2015; 44: 624–635. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rovero F, Zimmermann F, Berzid D, Meek P. Which camera trap type and how many do I need? A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications. Hystrix. 2013;24: 148–156.

MeSH terms