Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0537-9.

Multi-strategic intervention to enhance implementation of healthy canteen policy: a randomised controlled trial

Luke Wolfenden  1   2 , Nicole Nathan  3 , Lisa M Janssen  3   4 , John Wiggers  3   4 , Kathryn Reilly  3 , Tessa Delaney  3 , Christopher M Williams  3   4 , Colin Bell  5 , Rebecca Wyse  4 , Rachel Sutherland  3 , Libby Campbell  3 , Christophe Lecathelinais  3 , Chris Oldmeadow  6 , Megan Freund  3 , Sze Lin Yoong  3   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Multi-strategic intervention to enhance implementation of healthy canteen policy: a randomised controlled trial

Luke Wolfenden et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Internationally, governments have implemented school-based nutrition policies to restrict the availability of unhealthy foods from sale. The aim of the trial was to assess the effectiveness of a multi-strategic intervention to increase implementation of a state-wide healthy canteen policy. The impact of the intervention on the energy, total fat, and sodium of children's canteen purchases and on schools' canteen revenue was also assessed.

Methods: Australian primary schools with a canteen were randomised to receive a 12-14-month, multi-strategic intervention or to a no intervention control group. The intervention sought to increase implementation of a state-wide healthy canteen policy which required schools to remove unhealthy items (classified as 'red' or 'banned') from regular sale and encouraged schools to 'fill the menu' with healthy items (classified as 'green'). The intervention strategies included allocation of a support officer to assist with policy implementation, engagement of school principals and parent committees, consensus processes with canteen managers, training, provision of tools and resources, academic detailing, performance feedback, recognition and marketing initiatives. Data were collected at baseline (April to September, 2013) and at completion of the implementation period (November, 2014 to April, 2015).

Results: Seventy schools participated in the trial. Relative to control, at follow-up, intervention schools were significantly more likely to have menus without 'red' or 'banned' items (RR = 21.11; 95% CI 3.30 to 147.28; p ≤ 0.01) and to have at least 50% of menu items classified as 'green' (RR = 3.06; 95% CI 1.64 to 5.68; p ≤ 0.01). At follow-up, student purchases from intervention school canteens were significantly lower in total fat (difference = -1.51 g; 95% CI -2.84 to -0.18; p = 0.028) compared to controls, but not in energy (difference = -132.32 kJ; 95% CI -280.99 to 16.34; p = 0.080) or sodium (difference = -46.81 mg; 95% CI -96.97 to 3.35; p = 0.067). Canteen revenue did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: Poor implementation of evidence-based school nutrition policies is a problem experienced by governments internationally, and one with significant implications for public health. The study makes an important contribution to the limited experimental evidence regarding strategies to improve implementation of school nutrition policies and suggests that, with multi-strategic support, implementation of healthy canteen policies can be achieved in most schools.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12613000311752 ).

Keywords: Canteens; Children; Healthy eating; Implementation; Nutrition; Policy; School.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort 2010 flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO News and information. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(5):658–659.
    1. Jaime PC, Lock K. Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity? Prev Med. 2009;48(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Driessen CE, Cameron AJ, Thornton LE, et al. Effect of changes to the school food environment on eating behaviours and/or body weight in children: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014;15(12):968–982. doi: 10.1111/obr.12224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NSW Department of Health, NSW Department of Education and Training . Fresh Tastes @ School NSW healthy school canteen strategy: canteen menu planning guide. 3. Sydney: NSW Department of Health, NSW Department of Education and Training; 2012.
    1. Downs SM, Farmer A, Quintanilha M, et al. From paper to practice: barriers to adopting nutrition guidelines in schools. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(2):114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.04.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources