Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e013037.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013037.

Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Affiliations

Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Khalid B M Saeed et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Caesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally during the past three decades. Surgical site infection (SSI) following CS is a common cause of morbidity with reported rates of 3-15%. SSI represents a substantial burden to the health system including increased length of hospitalisation and costs of postdischarge care. The definition of SSI varies with the postoperative follow-up period among different health systems, resulting in differences in the reporting of SSI incidence. We propose to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled estimate for the overall incidence of SSI following CS.

Methods and analysis: We will perform a comprehensive search to identify all potentially relevant published studies on the incidence of SSI following CS reported from 1992 in the English language. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus will be searched using a detailed search strategy. Following study selection, full-text paper retrieval, data extraction and synthesis, we will appraise study quality and risk of bias and assess heterogeneity. Incidence data will be combined where feasible in a meta-analysis using Stata software and fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as this review will use published data. The review will evaluate the overall incidence of SSI following CS and will provide the first quantitative estimate of the magnitude of SSI. It will serve as a benchmark for future studies, identify research gaps and remaining challenges, and emphasise the need for appropriate prevention and control measures for SSI post-CS. A manuscript reporting the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number: CRD42015024426.

Keywords: Caesarean Section; Incidence; Pregnancy; Surgical Site Infection; meta-analysis, Systematic review; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OBSTETRICS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA et al. . Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:98–113. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010. HCUP Statistical Brief #149. 2013.
    1. Hospital Episode Statistics Analysis HaSCIC. NHS Maternity Statistics—England, 2014–15. http://www.hscic.gov.uk2015
    1. Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L et al. . 2013. Australia's mothers and babies 2011. Perinatal statistics series no. 28. Cat. no. PER 59 Canberra: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, 2011.
    1. Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request caesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1506–16. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242564.79349.b7 - DOI - PubMed