Implementation of a consumer-focused eHealth intervention for people with moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation
- PMID: 28077414
- PMCID: PMC5253559
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014353
Implementation of a consumer-focused eHealth intervention for people with moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation
Abstract
Introduction: Technology-mediated strategies have potential to engage patients in modifying unhealthy behaviour and improving medication adherence to reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, electronic tools offer a medium by which consumers can more actively navigate personal healthcare information. Understanding how, why and among whom such strategies have an effect can help determine the requirements for implementing them at a scale. This paper aims to detail a process evaluation that will (1) assess implementation fidelity of a multicomponent eHealth intervention; (2) determine its effective features; (3) explore contextual factors influencing and maintaining user engagement; and (4) describe barriers, facilitators, preferences and acceptability of such interventions.
Methods and analysis: Mixed-methods sequential design to derive, examine, triangulate and report data from multiple sources. Quantitative data from 3 sources will help to inform both sampling and content framework for the qualitative data collection: (1) surveys of patients and general practitioners (GPs); (2) software analytics; (3) programme delivery records. Qualitative data from interviews with patients and GPs, focus groups with patients and field notes taken by intervention delivery staff will be thematically analysed. Concurrent interview data collection and analysis will enable a thematic framework to evolve inductively and inform theory building, consistent with a realistic evaluation perspective. Eligible patients are those at moderate-to-high CVD risk who were randomised to the intervention arm of a randomised controlled trial of an eHealth intervention and are contactable at completion of the follow-up period; eligible GPs are the primary healthcare providers of these patients.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been received from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee and the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (AH&MRC) of New South Wales. Results will be disseminated via scientific forums including peer-reviewed publications and national and international conferences.
Trial registration number: ANZCTR 12613000715774.
Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Persuasive design features within a consumer-focused eHealth intervention integrated with the electronic health record: A mixed methods study of effectiveness and acceptability.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218447. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31220127 Free PMC article.
-
A randomised controlled trial of a consumer-focused e-health strategy for cardiovascular risk management in primary care: the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) study protocol.BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 31;4(2):e004523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004523. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 24486732 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lifestyle InterVention IN Gestational diabetes (LIVING) in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka: protocol for process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e037774. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037774. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33318108 Free PMC article.
-
Evolutionary Overview of Consumer Health Informatics: Bibliometric Study on the Web of Science from 1999 to 2019.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 9;23(9):e21974. doi: 10.2196/21974. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34499042 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of eHealth Services: Systematic Literature Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 22;21(11):e14197. doi: 10.2196/14197. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31755869 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 18;20(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05597-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32811480 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Persuasive design features within a consumer-focused eHealth intervention integrated with the electronic health record: A mixed methods study of effectiveness and acceptability.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218447. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31220127 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the "Shifting Weight using Intermittent Fasting in night-shift workers" weight loss interventions: a mixed-methods protocol.Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1228628. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1228628. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37744523 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Whether and How a Digital Health Intervention Improves Transition Care for Emerging Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 13;12:e46115. doi: 10.2196/46115. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37703070 Free PMC article.
-
Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol.BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017612. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29102990 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organisation. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report2010/en/ (accessed Apr 2016).
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Leading Causes of Death, 2013. http://www.aihw.gov.au/deaths/leading-causes-of-death/ (accessed Apr 2016).
-
- National Preventative Health Taskforce. Taking preventative action—a response to Australia: the healthiest country by 2020—the Report of the National Preventative Health Taskforce 2010. http://www.preventativehealth.org.au/internet/preventativehealth/publish... (accessed Apr 2016).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical