Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e015467.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015467.

International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q)

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q)

Karen W Y Wong Riff et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments should be developed according to rigorous guidelines in order to provide clinically meaningful, scientifically sound measurement. Understanding the methodology behind instrument development informs the selection of the most appropriate tool. This mixed methods protocol describes the development of an internationally applicable PRO instrument, the CLEFT-Q, for evaluating outcomes of treatment for cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).

Methods and analysis: The study includes three main phases that occur iteratively and interactively. In phase I, we determine what concepts are important to patients regarding their outcome. A conceptual framework for the CLEFT-Q is formed through a systematic review and an extensive international qualitative study. The systematic review ascertains what concepts have previously been measured in patients with CL/P. The qualitative study employs interpretive description and involves in-depth interviews with patients in high-income and lower-middle income countries. Preliminary items are generated from the qualitative data. Preliminary scales are then created for each theme in the framework. Cognitive debriefing interviews and expert clinician input are used to refine the scales in an iterative process. In phase II, the preliminary scales are administered to a large international group of patients with CL/P. The modern psychometric method of Rasch Measurement Theory analysis is employed to define the measurement characteristics. The preliminary scales are shortened based on these results. In phase III, further tests assess reliability, validity and responsiveness of the instrument.

Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by Research Ethics Boards for each participating site. Findings from this study will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Integrated knowledge translation is employed to engage stakeholders from the outset of the study. Successful execution of the CLEFT-Q will result in an internationally applicable PRO instrument for children and young adults with CL/P.

Keywords: child health; cleft lip and/or palate; patient-reported outcomes; psychometrics; quality of life; speech.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KWYWR, ET, TG, CRF, ALP and AFK declare that they have no competing interests. SJC started Modus Outcomes, a company that designs PRO instruments, after the inception of this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The phases of PRO instrument development. It is important to note that the phases can occur iteratively and interactively rather than in a linear progression. PRO, patient-reported outcome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram showing the multiphase mixed methods protocol for developing the CLEFT-Q. It is important to note that the process can be iterative and interactive as opposed to strictly linear. QUAN, quantitative study component; QUAL, qualitative study component.

References

    1. Basch E. The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. N Engl J Med 2010;362:865–9. 10.1056/NEJMp0911494 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG et al. . Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 2013;309:814–22. 10.1001/jama.2013.879 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka SA, Mahabir RC, Jupiter DC et al. . Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:511e–18e. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402dd1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paltzer J, Barker E, Witt WP. Measuring the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of young children in resource-limited settings: a review of existing measures. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1177–87. 10.1007/s11136-012-0260-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P et al. . The Eurocleft project 1996–2000: overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:131–40; discussion 41-2 10.1054/jcms.2001.0217 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms