Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;24(6):390-393.
doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.390-393.

Prevalence of Oral Lichen Planus in Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-Analysis Study

Affiliations

Prevalence of Oral Lichen Planus in Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-Analysis Study

Hamid Reza Mozaffari et al. Acta Inform Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is associated with various other systemic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM). This study evaluated the prevalence of OLP in DM patients compared with non-diabetic control subjects in a meta-analysis study.

Methods: In this study from January 1973 to August 2016, we searched the studies in Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Science direct, SID (Scientific Information Database), Cochrane and Embase databases. Strategy search was the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) term oral lichen planus or oral mucosa combined with diabetes in PubMed and this search in other databases. Heterogeneity between estimates was evaluated by the Q and I2 statistic. Also, publication bias was assessed through funnel plot analysis with the Kendall's and Egger's tests.

Results: From 831 studies were identified with different search strategies, 11 studies met the criteria to be included in meta-analysis (11 case-control studies). The overall prevalence of OLP in 11 studies with 4937 DM patients and 3698 control subjectswas 1.5% and 0.75%, respectively. In this meta-analysis, the OR in prevalence of OLP in DM patients compared with control subjects was 1.584 (95%CI1.013-2.477; P=0.044) with a low level of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) that the result showed the prevalence of OLP in DM patients is significantly more than control subjects.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis study showed an association between OLP with DM, whereas this association was no significant in previous studies, it was probably because different selecting of age, sex, type of DM, medications and criteria. Totally, the meta-analysis showed the risk of OLP in DM was higher compared with control subjects.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis study; Oral lichen planus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

• Conflict of interest: none declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of odds ratio of prevalence of oral lichen planus (95% confidence intervals) in diabetes mellitus patients compared with control subjects (Favours A: Patients; Favours B: Controls)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot of the included studies in the meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of lichen planus in diabetes mellitus patients

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mozaffari HR, Rahmani M, Rezaei F, Sadeghi M, Sharifi R, Ejtehadi A. Evaluation of oral lichen planus frequency in patients referred to pathology centers of Kermanshah city, during 2008 to 2011. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(6E):2200–2.
    1. Carazzo M, Thorpe R. Oral lichen planus: a review. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58(10):519–37. - PubMed
    1. Shen ZY, Liu W, Zhu LK, Feng JQ, Tang GY, Zhou ZT. A retrospective clinicopathological study on oral lichen planus and malignant transformation: Analysis of 518 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(6):e943–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torrente-Castells E, Figueiredo R, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Clinical features of oral lichen planus. A retrospective study of 65 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):e685–90. - PubMed
    1. Canter PH, Wider B, Ernst E. The antioxidant Vitamins A, C, E and selenium in the treatment of arthritis: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46(8):1223–33. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources