Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb;77(2):113-130.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0688-7.

PARP Inhibitors in Reproductive System Cancers: Current Use and Developments

Affiliations
Review

PARP Inhibitors in Reproductive System Cancers: Current Use and Developments

Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne et al. Drugs. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

The repair of DNA damage is a critical cellular process governed by multiple biochemical pathways that are often found to be defective in cancer cells. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of proteins controls response to single-strand DNA breaks by detecting these damaged sites and recruiting the proper factors for repair. Blocking this pathway forces cells to utilize complementary mechanisms to repair DNA damage. While PARP inhibition may not, in itself, be sufficient to cause tumor cell death, inhibition of DNA repair with PARP inhibitors is an effective cytotoxic strategy when it is used in patients who carry other defective DNA-repair mechanisms, such as mutations in the genes BRCA 1 and 2. This discovery has supported the development of PARP inhibitors (PARPi), agents that have proven effective against various types of tumors that carry BRCA mutations. With the application of next-generation sequencing of tumors, there is increased interest in looking beyond BRCA mutations to identify genetic and epigenetic aberrations that might lead to similar defects in DNA repair, conferring susceptibility to PARP inhibition. Identification of these genetic lesions and the development of screening assays for their detection may allow for the selection of patients most likely to respond to this class of anticancer agents. This article provides an overview of clinical trial results obtained with PARPi and describes the companion diagnostic assays being established for patient selection. In addition, we review known mechanisms for resistance to PARPi and potential strategies for combining these agents with other types of therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. Funding This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract Number HHSN261200800001E. Conflict of interest GO’Sullivan Coyne, AP Chen, R Meehan, and JH Doroshow have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtin N. PARP inhibitors for anticancer therapy. Biochem Soc Trans. 2014;42:82–88. doi: 10.1042/BST20130187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walsh CS. Two decades beyond BRCA1/2: homologous recombination, hereditary cancer risk and a target for ovarian cancer therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137:343–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown JS, Kaye SB, Yap TA. PARP inhibitors: the race is on. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:713–715. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.67. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polyak K, Garber J. Targeting the missing links for cancer therapy. Nat Med. 2011;17:283–284. doi: 10.1038/nm0311-283. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources