Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;49(6):1244-1251.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001202.

Prescribed Drinking Leads to Better Cycling Performance than Ad Libitum Drinking

Affiliations

Prescribed Drinking Leads to Better Cycling Performance than Ad Libitum Drinking

Costas N Bardis et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Drinking ad libitum during exercise often leads to dehydration ranging from -1% to -3% of body weight.

Purpose: This article aimed to study the effect of a prescribed hydration protocol matching fluid losses on a simulated 30-km criterium-like cycling performance in the heat (31.6°C ± 0.5°C).

Methods: Ten elite heat-acclimatized male endurance cyclists (30 ± 5 yr, 76.5 ± 7.2 kg, 1.81 ± 0.07 m, V˙O2peak = 61.3 ± 5.2 mL·min·kg, body fat = 10.5% ± 3.3%, Powermax = 392 ± 33 W) performed three sets of criterium-like cycling, which consisted of a 5-km cycling at 50% power max followed by a 5-km cycling all out at 3% grade (total 30 km). Participants rode the course on two separate occasions and in a counterbalanced order, during either ad libitum drinking (AD; drink water as much as they wished) or prescribed drinking (PD; drink water every 1 km to much fluid losses). To design the fluid intake during PD, participants performed a familiarization trial to calculate fluid losses.

Results: After the exercise protocol, the cyclist dehydrated by -0.5% ± 0.3% and -1.8% ± 0.7% of their body weight for the PD and AD trial, respectively. The mean cycling speed for the third bout of the 5-km hill cycling was greater in the PD trial (30.2 ± 2.4 km·h) compared with the AD trial (28.8 ± 2.6 km·h) by 5.1% ± 4.8% (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal, mean skin, and mean body temperatures immediately after the last hill climbing were greater in the AD compared with the PD trial (P < 0.05). Overall, sweat sensitivity during the three climbing bouts was lower in the AD (15.6 ± 5.7 g·W·m) compared with the PD trial (22.8 ± 3.4 g·W·m, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The data suggested that PD to match fluid losses during exercise in the heat provided a performance advantage because of lower thermoregulatory strain and greater sweating responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Improper Assessment of the Effect of Ad Libitum Drinking on Cycling Performance.
    Goulet EDB, Gosselin J, Hoffman MD. Goulet EDB, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1493. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001264. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017. PMID: 28622201 No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Kavouras SA, Bardis CN, Adams JD. Kavouras SA, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1494. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001265. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017. PMID: 28622202 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources