Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb:92:142-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints

Sara Finley  1
Affiliations

Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints

Sara Finley. J Mem Lang. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

One of the major questions in the cognitive science of language is whether the perceptual and phonological motivations for the rules and patterns that govern the sounds of language are a part of the psychological reality of grammatical representations. This question is particularly important in the study of phonological patterns - systematic constraints on the representation of sounds, because phonological patterns tend to be grounded in phonetic constraints. This paper focuses on phonological metathesis, which occurs when two adjacent sounds switch positions (e.g., cast pronounced as cats ). While many cases of phonological metathesis appear to be motivated by constraints on syllable structure, it is possible that these metathesis patterns are merely artifacts of historical change, and do not represent the linguistic knowledge of the speaker (Blevins & Garrett, 1998). Participants who were exposed to a metathesis pattern that can be explained in terms of structural or perceptual improvement were less likely to generalize to metathesis patterns that did not show the same improvements. These results support a substantively biased theory in which phonological patterns are encoded in terms of structurally motivated constraints.

Keywords: Artificial grammar learning; Metathesis; Phonology; Syllable structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experiment 1 results: means and standard errors.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experiment 2 results: means and standard errors.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Experiment 3 results: means and standard errors.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Experiment 4 results: means and standard errors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson S. Why phonology isn’t “natural”. Linguistic Inquiry. 1981;12:493–539.
    1. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language. 2013;68(3):255–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berent I, Balaban E, Lennertz T, Vaknin-Nusbaum V. Phonological universals constrain the processing of nonspeech stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2010;139(3):418–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020094. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berent I, Lennertz T. Universal constraints on the sound structure of language: Phonological or acoustic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010;36(1):212–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017638. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berent I, Lennertz T, Smolensky P, Vaknin-Nusbaum V. Listeners’ knowledge of phonological universals: Evidence from nasal clusters. Phonology. 2009;26(01):75–108. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources