Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):16.

Measuring the Quality of Care for Psychological Health Conditions in the Military Health System: Candidate Quality Measures for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder

Kimberly A Hepner, Carol P Roth, Coreen Farris, Elizabeth M Sloss, Grant R Martsolf, Harold Alan Pincus, Katherine E Watkins, Caroline Batka, Daniel Mandel, Susan D Hosek, Carrie M Farmer

Measuring the Quality of Care for Psychological Health Conditions in the Military Health System: Candidate Quality Measures for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder

Kimberly A Hepner et al. Rand Health Q. .

Abstract

In recent years, the number of U.S. service members treated for psychological health conditions has increased substantially. In particular, at least two psychological health conditions-posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD)-have become more common, with prevalence estimates up to 20 percent for PTSD and 37 percent for MDD. Delivering quality care to service members with these conditions is a high-priority goal for the military health system (MHS). Meeting this goal requires understanding the extent to which the care the MHS provides is consistent with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and its own standards for quality. To better understand these issues, RAND Corporation researchers developed a framework to identify and classify a set of measures for monitoring the quality of care provided by the MHS for PTSD and MDD. The goal of this project was to identify, develop, and describe a set of candidate quality measures to assess care for PTSD and MDD. To accomplish this goal, the authors performed two tasks: (1) developed a conceptual framework for assessing the quality of care for psychological health conditions and (2) identified a candidate set of measures for monitoring, assessing, and improving the quality of care for PTSD and MDD. This article describes their research approach and the candidate measure sets for PTSD and MDD that they identified. The current task did not include implementation planning but provides the foundation for future RAND work to pilot a subset of these measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Questions Addressed by Measures in the Care Continuum
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Questions Addressed by Each Measure Type
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, “Uses of Quality Measures,” undated; referenced 2013. As of August 23, 2013: http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/selecting-and-using/using.aspx
    1. AHRQ—See Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. - PubMed
    1. Damschroder, Laura J., Aron David C., Keith Rosalind E., Kirsh Susan R., Alexander Jeffery A., and Lowery Julie C., “Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science,” Implementation Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, August 7, 2009. As of January 30, 2014: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-4-50.pdf - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donabedian, Avedis, An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    1. Institute of Medicine, Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and Their Families, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013. As of May 9, 2014: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13499 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources