Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169933.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169933. eCollection 2017.

The APPLE Score - A Novel Score for the Prediction of Rhythm Outcomes after Repeat Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations

The APPLE Score - A Novel Score for the Prediction of Rhythm Outcomes after Repeat Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Jelena Kornej et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation occur in up to 50% within one year but their prediction remains challenging. Recently, we developed a novel score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after single AF ablation demonstrating superiority to other scores. The current study was performed to 1) prove the predictive value of the APPLE score in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation and 2) compare it with the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores.

Methods: Rhythm outcome between 3-12 months after AF ablation were documented. The APPLE score (one point for Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73m2), LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF <50%) was calculated in every patient before procedure.

Results: 379 consecutive patients from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry (60±10 years, 65% male, 70% paroxysmal AF) undergoing repeat AF catheter ablation were included. Arrhythmia recurrences were observed in 133 patients (35%). While the CHADS2 (AUC 0.577, p = 0.037) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (AUC 0.590, p = 0.015) demonstrated low predictive value, the APPLE score showed better prediction of arrhythmia recurrences (AUC 0.617, p = 0.002) than other scores (both p<0.001). Compared to patients with an APPLE score of 0, the risk (OR) for arrhythmia recurrences was 2.9, 3.0 and 6.0 (all p<0.01) for APPLE scores 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively.

Conclusions: The novel APPLE score is superior to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for prediction of rhythm outcomes after repeat AF catheter ablation. It may be helpful to identify patients with low, intermediate or high risk for recurrences after repeat procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Prediction of arrhythmia recurrences using CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and APPLE scores.
Fig 2
Fig 2. APPLE score and risk for arrythmia recurrences in repeat catheter ablation in whole study population (n = 379).
The figure presents incidence of arrhythmia recurrences (%) according to each APPLE score point. Compared to patients with an APPLE score of 0 (reference), the risk (OR) for arrhythmia recurrences was 2.9 (95% CI 1.4–6.3, p = 0.006), 3.0 (95% CI 1.3–6.6, p = 0.007) and 6.0 (95% CI 2.2–16.8, p = 0.001) for APPLE scores 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively.

References

    1. Ganesan AN, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, Kuklik P, Lau DH, Lim HS, et al. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e004549 10.1161/JAHA.112.004549 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canpolat U, Aytemir K, Yorgun H, Sahiner L, Kaya EB, Oto A. A proposal for a new scoring system in the prediction of catheter ablation outcomes: Promising results from the Turkish Cryoablation Registry. Int J Cardiol 2013;169(3):201–206. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wojcik M, Berkowitsch A, Greiss H, Zaltsberg S, Pajitnev D, Deubner N, et al. Repeated catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to predict outcome? Circ J 2013;77:2271–2279. - PubMed
    1. Al-Hijji MA, Deshmukh AJ, Yao X, Mwangi R, Sangaralingham LR, Friedman PA, et al. Trends and predictors of repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2016;171(1):48–55. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Q, Jiang SL, Liu X, Yang YQ. Repeat Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with a Total Atrial Fibrillation Duration of More Than 2 Years: Effects of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate on the Outcomes. Intern Med. 2016;55(18):2537–47. 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5790 - DOI - PubMed