Left ventricular assist device outcomes based on flow configuration and pre-operative left ventricular dimension: An Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Analysis
- PMID: 28087105
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.12.004
Left ventricular assist device outcomes based on flow configuration and pre-operative left ventricular dimension: An Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Analysis
Abstract
Background: Axial configuration (AC) and centrifugal configuration (CC) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have different flow characteristics, and whether the interaction between device flow configuration and the pre-operative left ventricular internal diastolic diameter (LVIDD) mediates adverse events after LVAD implantation is unknown.
Methods: We queried 9,424 continuous-flow LVAD recipients who received LVADs from April 2008 to June of 2015 in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). The pre-operative LVIDD * flow configuration interaction term was tested in multivariable models to determine its relationship to adverse events.
Results: The pre-operative LVIDD * flow configuration interaction was a significant predictor of device thrombosis. As the LVIDD increased, the risk of AC device thrombosis increased compared with CC devices (p = 0.0099). At 7.0 cm, the hazard ratio (HR) for AC device thrombosis compared with the CC device was 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.22; p = 0.004) and continued to rise as the LVIDD increased. The LVIDD * flow configuration interaction did not predict stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, or patient survival. In multivariable models, the hazard of stroke was higher with the CC device regardless of the LVIDD (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.64-2.36; p < 0.0001). Adjusted analyses showed LVAD implantation into a larger left ventricle was associated with a lower risk of death (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95; p = 0.0004) per centimeter of LVIDD.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that the pre-operative LVIDD, flow configuration, and interaction terms should be considered individually when choosing the appropriate LVAD to mitigate the rates of device thrombosis, stroke, and death.
Keywords: LVAD; adverse events; axial-flow; centrifugal-flow; left ventricular size.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23490245
-
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019. PMID: 30691593
-
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 27. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24418730
-
Current axial-flow devices--the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Fall;20(3):264-72. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.08.001. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 19038737 Review.
-
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33465365 Review.
Cited by
-
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Medical Treatment to Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):985-994. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02095-6. Epub 2024 Jul 11. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38990491 Review.
-
Pre-implant left ventricular dimension is not associated with worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Sep;13(9):5458-5466. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2778. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34659812 Free PMC article.
-
Impella 5.5 in left ventricular noncompaction syndrome as bridge to heart transplant.JHLT Open. 2023 Dec 29;4:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100051. eCollection 2024 May. JHLT Open. 2023. PMID: 40144250 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-Specific Disparities in the Female Vs Male Patient Population in Left Ventricular Assist Device Use.CJC Open. 2025 Apr 29;7(8):1140-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.017. eCollection 2025 Aug. CJC Open. 2025. PMID: 40894851 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients with Preoperative Severe Mitral Regurgitation.ASAIO J. 2021 Oct 1;67(10):1139-1147. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001379. ASAIO J. 2021. PMID: 34570728 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous