Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 14;17(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0395-y.

Impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews

Laura Boland  1 , France Légaré  2 , Maria Margarita Becerra Perez  3 , Matthew Menear  3 , Mirjam Marjolein Garvelink  3 , Daniel I McIsaac  4 , Geneviève Painchaud Guérard  3 , Julie Emond  5 , Nathalie Brière  6 , Dawn Stacey  7   8
Affiliations

Impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews

Laura Boland et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Many elders struggle with the decision to remain at home or to move to an alternative location of care. A person's location of care can influence health and wellbeing. Healthcare organizations and policy makers are increasingly challenged to better support elders' dwelling and health care needs. A summary of the evidence that examines home care compared to other care locations can inform decision making. We surveyed and summarized the evidence evaluating the impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes.

Methods: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews. Data sources included MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Eligible reviews included adults 65+ years, elder home care, alternative care locations, and elder health outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened citations. We extracted data and appraised review quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist. Results were synthesized narratively.

Results: The search yielded 2575 citations, of which 19 systematic reviews were eligible. Three hundred and forty studies with 271,660 participants were synthesized across the systematic reviews. The categories of comparisons included: home with support versus independent living at home (n = 11 reviews), home care versus institutional care (n = 3 reviews), and rehabilitation at home versus conventional rehabilitation services (n = 7 reviews). Two reviews had data relevant to two categories. Most reviews favoured home with support to independent living at home. Findings comparing home care to institutional care were mixed. Most reviews found no differences in health outcomes between rehabilitation at home versus conventional rehabilitation services. Systematic review quality was moderate, with a median AMSTAR score of 6 (range 4 - 10 out of 11).

Conclusions: The evidence on the impact of home care compared to alternative care locations on elder health outcomes is heterogeneous. Our findings support positive health impacts of home support interventions for community dwelling elders compared to independent living at home. There is insufficient evidence to determine the impact of alternative care locations on elders' health. Additional research targeting housing and care options for the elderly is needed.

Keywords: Decision Support; Health; Location of elderly care; Overview of reviews; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bynum JPW, Meara ER, Chang CH, Rhoads JM, Bronner KK. Our parents, ourselves: health care for an aging population: a report of the Dartmough Atlas Project. Lebanon, NH: The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy & Clinical Practice; 2016. - PubMed
    1. United Nations. World Population Ageing 2013. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division 2013
    1. Ausserhofer D, Deschodt M, De Geest S, van Achterberg T, Meyer G, Verbeek H, Sjetne IS, Malinowaska-Lipien I, Griffiths P, Schliter W, et al. “There’s No Place Like Home”: A Scoping Review on the Impact of Homelike Residential Care Models on Resident-, Family-, and Staff-Related Outcomes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(8):685–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawton MP, Nahemow L. Ecology and the aging process. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association; 1973. pp. 619–674.
    1. Beard J, Officer A, Cassels A. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.

Publication types

Grants and funding