Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
- PMID: 28088498
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.003
Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: The current study aims to evaluate if vaginal misoprostol (400 mcg) administered prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion increases the ease and success of insertion among women who had delivered only by elective cesarean delivery (CD).
Study design: The current study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Assiut Women's Health Hospital, Egypt, between the 1st of April 2015 and the 31st of March 2016 and included women who delivered only by elective CD. One hundred forty women were randomized into two groups; misoprostol group received two misoprostol 400-mcg tablets vaginally, and placebo group received two placebo tablets 3 h before a copper T380A IUD insertion. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the ease of insertion score using a 10-cm visual analog scale between both groups with 0=very easy insertion, and 10=terribly difficult insertion.
Results: The ease of insertion score was lower in the misoprostol group (2.2±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.5, p=.0001) with higher number of successful IUD insertions than the placebo group (69 [98.6%] vs. 61 [87.1%], p=.009). The mean pain score reported by the women was lower in misoprostol group (2.7±0.6 vs. 4.3±0.8) with higher level of satisfaction from the whole procedure (8.9±0.4 vs. 7.9±0.2) with p=.001 for both.
Conclusions: Misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally prior to IUD insertion eases and increase the success of insertion with reduction of pain among women who had delivered only by elective CD.
Implications: The use of vaginal misoprostol before IUD insertion in women who had never delivered vaginally before may increase the ease and success of insertion. Moreover, it may reduce the pain felt by women during the procedure.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Contraception; Intrauterine device; Misoprostol.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section - reply to letter to the editor.Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):435. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28188744 No abstract available.
-
Comments on manuscript: vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):434-435. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28189667 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol vs Vaginal Dinoprostone Administered 3 Hours Prior to Copper T380A Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Oct;33(5):559-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 21. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32330638 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 4. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 27823944 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized double blinded clinical trial to explore the clinical outcomes of vaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) administration six hours prior to T380A intrauterine device insertion in persons delivered only by cesarean delivery.Contraception. 2023 Apr;120:109788. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 35183498 Clinical Trial.
-
Misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Feb;25(1):76-86. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1706079. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020. PMID: 31914331
-
More harm than good: the lack of evidence for administering misoprostol prior to IUD insertion.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Dec;34(12):1177-1179. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35465-2. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012. PMID: 23231800 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Dec;98(12):1500-1513. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13662. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019. PMID: 31112295 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Intrauterine Device Insertion-Related Pain and Ease of Procedure at Different Times During Menstruation.Medeni Med J. 2021;36(3):225-232. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2021.89633. Epub 2021 Sep 30. Medeni Med J. 2021. PMID: 34915681 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous