Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 1;19(6):358-361.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.010.

A distal-lock electromagnetic targeting device for intramedullary nailing: Suggestions and clinical experience

Guido Antonini  1 , Wilfried Stuflesser, Cornelio Crippa, Georgios Touloupakis
Affiliations

A distal-lock electromagnetic targeting device for intramedullary nailing: Suggestions and clinical experience

Guido Antonini et al. Chin J Traumatol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To describe our clinical experience with a system named SureShot? Distal Targeting (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, USA) based on magnetic field presence and discuss our suggestions on this technique.

Methods: We analysed prospectively 47 patients affected by humeral, tibial or femoral fractures, treated in our institution during a 3-year period of time (August 2010 to September 2013). We considered the following parameters: the time to set up, the time to position a single screw, the effectiveness of the system (drilling ad screwing), the irradiation exposure time during distal locking procedure and surgical complications.

Results: A total number of 96 screws were inserted. The mean preparation time of the device was 5.1 min ± 2 min (range 3-10 min). The mean time for single screw targeting was 5.8 min ± 2.3 min (range 4-18 min). No major complications occurred. Only a few locking procedures were needed to be practiced in order to obtain the required expertise with this targeting device.

Conclusion: According to our results, this device is reliable and valid whenever the correct technique is followed. It is also user friendly, exposes to lower radiation and needs less surgical time compared to relative data from the literature. However, the surgeon should always be aware of how to use the free hand technique in case of malfunctioning of the system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A: Positioning of the probe inside the nail; B: Selection of nail type; C: Collimation of the targets.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Assisted drilling with the “targeter” in one hand and the drill in the other one.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A: Assisted drilling; B: Assisted screwing.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gugala Z., Nana A., Lindsey R.W. Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally-based targeting device techniques. Injury. 2001;32:SD21-5. - PubMed
    1. Moreschini O., Petrucci V., Cannata R. Insertion of distal locking screws of tibial intramedullary nails: a comparison between the free-hand technique and the SURESHOT™ Distal Targeting System. Injury. 2014;45:405–407. - PubMed
    1. Dursun M., Kalkan T., Aytekin M.N. Does the magnetic-guided intramedullary nailing technique shorten operation time and radiation exposure? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:1005–1011. - PubMed
    1. Uruc V., Ozden R., Dogramacı Y. The comparison of freehand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants. Injury. 2013;44:863–866. - PubMed
    1. Stathopoulos I., Karampinas P., Evangelopoulos D.S. Radiation-free distal locking of intramedullary nails: evaluation of a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system. Injury. 2013;44:872–875. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources