[A comparison of various supraglottic airway devices for fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation]
- PMID: 28089425
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.12.009
[A comparison of various supraglottic airway devices for fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation]
Abstract
Background: Fiberoptical assisted intubation via placed supraglottic airway devices has been described as safe and easy procedure to manage difficult airways. However visualization of the glottis aperture is essential for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Various different supraglottic airway devices are commercially available and might offer different conditions for fiberoptical assisted intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the best obtainable view of the glottic aperture using different supraglottic airway devices.
Methods: With approval of the local ethics committee 52 adult patients undergoing elective anesthesia were randomly assigned to a supraglottic airway device (Laryngeal Tube, Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique, Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme, Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once). After standardized induction of anaesthesia the supraglottic airway device was placed according to the manufacturers recommendations. After successful ventilation the position of the supraglottic airway device in regard to the glottic opening was examined with a flexible fiberscope. A fully or partially visible glottic aperture was considered as suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Suitability for fiberoptical assisted intubation was compared between the groups (H-test, U-test; p<0.05).
Results: Demographic data was not different between the groups. Placement of the supraglottic airway device and adequate ventilation was successful in all attempts. Glottic view suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation differed between the devices ranging from 40% for the laringeal tube (LT), 66% for the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, 70% for the Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel and 90% for both the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once.
Conclusion: None of the used supraglottic airway devices offered a full or partial glottic view in all cases. However the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once seem to be more suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation compared to other devices.
Keywords: Difficult airway; Dispositivo supraglótico; Fibreoptic intubation; Intubação guiada por fibra óptica; Supraglottic airway device; Via aérea difícil.
Copyright © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of various supraglottic airway devices for fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;67(2):166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.09.007. Epub 2016 May 26. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28236864 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation via laryngeal mask and laryngeal tube.Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;9(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.146285. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 25558197 Free PMC article.
-
The i-gel Supraglottic Airway as a Conduit for Fibreoptic Tracheal Intubation - A Randomized Comparison with the Single-use Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway and CTrach Laryngeal Mask in Patients with Predicted Difficult Laryngoscopy.Prague Med Rep. 2016;117(4):164-175. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2016.17. Prague Med Rep. 2016. PMID: 27930894 Clinical Trial.
-
Laryngeal tubes and laryngeal mask devices for supraglottic airway management in out-of-hospital emergency care: a systematic review.Emergencias. 2019 Dic;31(6):417-428. Emergencias. 2019. PMID: 31777215 English, Spanish.
-
[Supraglottic airway devices].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011 Sep;46(9):598-607. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286612. Epub 2011 Sep 5. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011. PMID: 21894593 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous