Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;4(23):453.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.24.

Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques

Affiliations
Review

Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques

Ido Badash et al. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

As a result of recent work-hours limitations and concerns for patient safety, innovations in extraclinical surgical simulation have become a desired part of residency education. Current simulation models, including cadaveric, animal, bench-top, virtual reality (VR) and robotic simulators are increasingly used in surgical training programs. Advances in telesurgery, three-dimensional (3D) printing, and the incorporation of patient-specific anatomy are paving the way for simulators to become integral components of medical training in the future. Evidence from the literature highlights the benefits of including simulations in surgical training; skills acquired through simulations translate into improvements in operating room performance. Moreover, simulations are rapidly incorporating new medical technologies and offer increasingly high-fidelity recreations of procedures. As a result, both novice and expert surgeons are able to benefit from their use. As dedicated, structured curricula are developed that incorporate simulations into daily resident training, simulated surgeries will strengthen the surgeon's skill set, decrease hospital costs, and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Surgical simulator; surgical training; three-dimensional printing (3D printing); virtual reality (VR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Hutter MM, Kellogg KC, Ferguson CM, et al. The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons. Ann Surg 2006;243:864-71; discussion 871-5. 10.1097/01.sla.0000220042.48310.66 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valentine R, Padhye V, Wormald PJ. Simulation Training for Vascular Emergencies in Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016;49:877-87. 10.1016/j.otc.2016.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 2005;241:364-72. 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Surgical simulation in 2013: why is it still not the standard in surgical training? J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:294-301. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Satava RM. Historical review of surgical simulation--a personal perspective. World J Surg 2008;32:141-8. 10.1007/s00268-007-9374-y - DOI - PubMed