The criteria for metabolic syndrome and the national health screening and education system in Japan
- PMID: 28092931
- PMCID: PMC5343105
- DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2017003
The criteria for metabolic syndrome and the national health screening and education system in Japan
Abstract
Two major definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed. One focuses on the accumulation of risk factors, a measure used by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); the other focuses on abdominal obesity, a measure used by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the Japanese government. The latter definition takes waist circumference (WC) into consideration as an obligatory component, whereas the former does not. In 2009, the IDF, NHLBI, AHA, and other organizations attempted to unify these criteria; as a result, WC is no longer an obligatory component of those systems, while it remains obligatory in the Japanese criteria. In 2008, a new Japanese cardiovascular screening and education system focused on metabolic syndrome was launched. People undergoing screening are classified into three groups according to the presence of abdominal obesity and the number of metabolic risk factors, and receive health educational support from insurers. This system has yielded several beneficial outcomes: the visibility of metabolic syndrome at the population level has drastically improved; preventive measures have been directed toward metabolic syndrome, which is expected to become more prevalent in future generations; and a post-screening education system has been established. However, several problems with the current system have been identified and are under debate. In this review, we discuss topics related to metabolic syndrome, including (1) the Japanese criteria for metabolic syndrome; (2) metabolic syndrome and the universal health screening and education system; and (3) recent debates about Japanese criteria for metabolic syndrome.
Keywords: Abdominal obesity; Health education; Metabolic syndrome X; Risk factors; Universal health screening.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.
Figures
References
-
- Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J, IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059–1062. - PubMed
-
- Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752. - PubMed
-
- Committee to Evaluate Diagnostic Standards for Metabolic Syndrome Definition and the diagnostic standard for metabolic syndrome. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;94:794–809. (Japanese) - PubMed
-
- Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. - PubMed
-
- Chei CL, Yamagishi K, Tanigawa T, Kitamura A, Imano H, Kiyama M, et al. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke among middle-aged Japanese. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:1887–1894. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
